Thorpe S J, Abel P
Division of Haematology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK.
Int J Exp Pathol. 1991 Apr;72(2):129-38.
Three monoclonal anti-blood group H and four monoclonal anti-blood group A antibodies directed at the blood group antigens on Type 1 or Type 2 backbone structures were evaluated as immunohistochemical reagents by indirect immunofluorescence of normal and neoplastic bladder epithelia. The results were compared with fluorescence using polyclonal rabbit anti-A or H sera or Ulex europaeus lectin. The monoclonal antibodies gave less intense or more restricted immunofluorescence than the conventional reagents but showed considerable variation in the extent of their reactivities with urothelial samples from different individuals. In some cases they failed to give immunofluorescence with tissue samples known to contain the immunodominant blood group structures they recognize. In addition, hitherto unsuspected heterogeneity was revealed in the expression of the Type 2-based blood group H and A-structures in the endothelia of neighbouring small blood vessels.
针对1型或2型主链结构上血型抗原的三种抗血型H单克隆抗体和四种抗血型A单克隆抗体,通过对正常和肿瘤性膀胱上皮进行间接免疫荧光法,评估其作为免疫组化试剂的效果。将结果与使用兔抗A或H多克隆血清或荆豆凝集素的荧光结果进行比较。与传统试剂相比,单克隆抗体产生的免疫荧光强度较低或范围较窄,但在与不同个体的尿路上皮样本的反应程度上表现出相当大的差异。在某些情况下,它们无法对已知含有其识别的免疫显性血型结构的组织样本产生免疫荧光。此外,在相邻小血管内皮中基于2型的血型H和A结构的表达中发现了迄今未被怀疑的异质性。