Suppr超能文献

口腔癌择期气管切开术的气管切口

Tracheal incision for elective tracheotomy in oral cavity cancer.

作者信息

Lin Zeng-Ming, Chen Peir-Rong, Chou Andy Shau-Bin, Hsu Lee-Ping

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan, 707, Sect. 3, Chung-Yang Road, Hualien city, Taiwan.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2007 Jan;43(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.11.014. Epub 2006 Oct 31.

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to compare operative procedure and postoperative complications between horizontal tracheal incision and window-type tracheal excision for elective tracheotomy in patients with oral cavity cancer. Between February 2003 and April 2004, 40 patients with advanced-stage oral cavity cancer were consecutively seen at our tumor clinic. All patients underwent elective tracheotomy before wide excision of the tumor and free flap reconstruction. Either horizontal tracheal incision (H group) or window-type tracheal excision (W group) was randomly carried out in two groups comprising 20 patients each. The post-tracheotomy tracheal stenosis was evaluated by tracheal computed tomography (CT) coupled with advantage workstation 4.0 software for reconstruction. Both groups had the following similar characteristics: age, gender, tracheotomy days, or interval between decannulation and CT scan evaluation. However, the incision time was statistically less in the H group (16.4s) compared with the W group (43.4s). Tracheal stenosis was found in five patients (25%) in the H group and four patients (20%) in the W group, with no significant differences. Nevertheless, neither dyspnea or stridor after decannulation, difficulty in tube exchange, nor accidental extrusion was reported in either groups. The horizontal incision for elective tracheotomy is simpler and faster than the window-type tracheal excision. The complication rate is not significantly different in both groups. We therefore, recommend using horizontal incision for elective tracheotomy in patients with oral cavity cancer.

摘要

本前瞻性研究的目的是比较口腔癌患者择期气管切开术中水平气管切口与窗式气管切除术的手术操作及术后并发症。2003年2月至2004年4月期间,40例晚期口腔癌患者在我们的肿瘤门诊连续就诊。所有患者在肿瘤广泛切除及游离皮瓣重建术前均接受择期气管切开术。将患者随机分为两组,每组20例,分别采用水平气管切口(H组)或窗式气管切除术(W组)。气管切开术后气管狭窄通过气管计算机断层扫描(CT)结合Advantage Workstation 4.0软件进行重建评估。两组患者在年龄、性别、气管切开天数或拔管至CT扫描评估的间隔时间等方面具有相似特征。然而,H组的切口时间(16.4秒)在统计学上短于W组(43.4秒)。H组有5例患者(25%)出现气管狭窄,W组有4例患者(20%)出现气管狭窄,差异无统计学意义。然而,两组均未报告拔管后呼吸困难或喘鸣、换管困难或意外拔管情况。择期气管切开术的水平切口比窗式气管切除术更简单、更快。两组的并发症发生率无显著差异。因此,我们建议口腔癌患者择期气管切开术采用水平切口。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验