Pouratian Nader, Gasco Jaime, Sherman Jonathan H, Shaffrey Mark E, Schiff David
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Box 800212, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0212, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2007 May;82(3):281-8. doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9280-4. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
Protracted low dose temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-21 of 28 days) offers potential advantages over standard temozolomide schedules (200 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 of 28 days) including greater cumulative drug exposure and depletion of O(6)-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase levels, theoretically overcoming intrinsic chemoresistance. We retrospectively review our experience in 25 patients with pathologically proven low grade gliomas (LGG) treated with protracted low dose temozolomide to primarily quantify its toxicity and secondarily to assess efficacy. None had previously received radiation. Tumor response was graded based on changes in tumor size, steroid requirements, and clinical exam. About 243 cycles of protracted low dose temozolomide were administered. Three patients (12%) were changed to standard temozolomide dosing due to side effects, including intractable nausea (n = 2) and multiple cytopenias (n = 1). The most frequent toxicities were fatigue (76%), lymphopenia (72% [48% high grade]), constipation (56%), and nausea (52%). High grade toxicities (other than lymphopenia) included secondary malignancy, pruritus, hyponatremia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and cognitive decline (n = 1 for each). Tumor response rate was 52% and and disease control rate was 84%. Six month PFS was 92% and 12 month PFS was 72%. Response rates and PFS were independent of pathological subtype, deletion status, and indication for chemotherapy. Protracted low dose temozolomide has a distinct spectrum of toxicities compared to standard dosing but is well tolerated in most patients and may provide improved response rates compared to standard dosing. The results of larger randomized trials are needed to assess its potential advantages over other management schemes.
延长低剂量替莫唑胺(28天疗程中第1 - 21天75mg/m²/天)相较于标准替莫唑胺给药方案(28天疗程中第1 - 5天200mg/m²/天)具有潜在优势,包括更高的累积药物暴露量以及O(6)-烷基鸟嘌呤DNA烷基转移酶水平的降低,理论上可克服内在化疗耐药性。我们回顾性分析了25例经病理证实的低级别胶质瘤(LGG)患者接受延长低剂量替莫唑胺治疗的经验,主要目的是量化其毒性,其次是评估疗效。所有患者此前均未接受过放疗。根据肿瘤大小变化、类固醇需求及临床检查对肿瘤反应进行分级。共给予约243个周期的延长低剂量替莫唑胺治疗。3例患者(12%)因副作用改为标准替莫唑胺给药方案,副作用包括顽固性恶心(2例)和多种血细胞减少(1例)。最常见的毒性反应为疲劳(76%)、淋巴细胞减少(72% [48%为重度])、便秘(56%)和恶心(52%)。重度毒性反应(除淋巴细胞减少外)包括继发性恶性肿瘤、瘙痒、低钠血症、中性粒细胞减少、白细胞减少和认知功能下降(各1例)。肿瘤反应率为52%,疾病控制率为84%。6个月无进展生存率为92%,12个月无进展生存率为72%。反应率和无进展生存率与病理亚型、缺失状态及化疗指征无关。与标准给药相比,延长低剂量替莫唑胺具有独特的毒性谱,但大多数患者耐受性良好,与标准给药相比可能提供更高的反应率。需要更大规模的随机试验结果来评估其相对于其他治疗方案的潜在优势。