Benoit Ronald M, Peele Pamela B, Cannon Glenn M, Docimo Steven G
Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 5200 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2649-53; discussion 2653. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.054.
The use of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer has become increasingly popular as an alternative to ureteral reimplantation in the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. We compared the cost-effectiveness of performing dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection at the time of diagnosis of reflux to that of traditional management.
A model to estimate the costs of managing vesicoureteral reflux has previously been created. We updated the model to compare the costs of managing vesicoureteral reflux by traditional methods with the costs of managing reflux if dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection is performed at the time of diagnosis. The success rate required for dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection at diagnosis to be as cost effective as traditional management was estimated. We used 2 models of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection at diagnosis-injection at diagnosis proceeding to traditional management if injection failed (scenario 1), and injection at diagnosis proceeding to ureteral reimplantation if injection failed (scenario 2).
If reflux is stratified by grade in scenario 1, for grades III, IV and V respective success rates of 88.5%, 66.6%, and 55.6% for unilateral reflux and 97.5%, 89.7% and 91.4% for bilateral reflux must be achieved to have equal cost-effectiveness to traditional management, while grades I and II reflux can never achieve equal cost-effectiveness. Stratified by grade for scenario 2, for grades III, IV and V respective success rates of 86.9%, 70.8% and 55.8% for unilateral reflux, and 97.6%, 89.8% and 89.8% for bilateral reflux must be achieved to attain equal cost-effectiveness compared to traditional management. In scenario 2 dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection at diagnosis for grades I and II unilateral and bilateral reflux can never achieve equal cost-effectiveness compared to traditional management.
Based on the results of this study, in most clinical situations dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection at the time of diagnosis is unlikely to be as cost effective as traditional management of vesicoureteral reflux.
葡聚糖凝胶/透明质酸共聚物作为输尿管再植术的替代方法,在治疗膀胱输尿管反流中的应用越来越广泛。我们比较了在反流诊断时进行葡聚糖凝胶/透明质酸注射与传统治疗方法的成本效益。
之前已建立了一个估算膀胱输尿管反流管理成本的模型。我们更新了该模型,以比较传统方法管理膀胱输尿管反流的成本与诊断时进行葡聚糖凝胶/透明质酸注射管理反流的成本。估算了诊断时葡聚糖凝胶/透明质酸注射要与传统管理具有相同成本效益所需的成功率。我们使用了两种诊断时葡聚糖凝胶/透明质酸注射的模型——诊断时注射,若注射失败则采用传统管理(方案1),以及诊断时注射,若注射失败则进行输尿管再植术(方案2)。
在方案1中,如果按反流等级分层,对于III级、IV级和V级,单侧反流的成功率分别达到88.5%、66.6%和55.6%,双侧反流分别达到97.5%、89.7%和91.4%时,才能与传统管理具有相同的成本效益,而I级和II级反流永远无法达到相同的成本效益。在方案2中按等级分层,对于III级、IV级和V级,单侧反流的成功率分别达到86.9%、70.8%和55.8%,双侧反流分别达到97.6%、89.8%和89.8%时,才能与传统管理具有相同的成本效益。在方案2中,对于I级和II级单侧及双侧反流,诊断时进行葡聚糖凝胶/透明质酸注射与传统管理相比,永远无法达到相同的成本效益。
基于本研究结果,在大多数临床情况下,诊断时进行葡聚糖凝胶/透明质酸注射不太可能与膀胱输尿管反流的传统管理具有相同的成本效益。