Gbadegesin Segun, Wendler David
Department of Philosophy, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA.
Bioethics. 2006 Sep;20(5):248-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00501.x.
Guidelines for health research focus on protecting individual research subjects. Yet several commentators have argued that protecting individual subjects, while undoubtedly important, is not sufficient to ensure ethical research. It is also vital to protect the communities involved in health research. In particular, a number of studies have been criticized on the grounds that they exploited host communities. Although these criticisms have received a good deal of attention, there has been no systematic analysis of what constitutes community exploitation in health research, nor an assessment of what safeguards are needed to protect against it. This is a serious deficiency. The absence of an analysis of community exploitation makes it impossible to ensure that host communities are protected against exploitation. The absence of an analysis also raises the possibility that charges of exploitation may block important research, without any way of assessing whether the charges are warranted. The present paper attempts to address these concerns by providing an analysis of community exploitation and, based on this analysis, determining what safeguards are needed to protect communities in health research against exploitation.
健康研究指南侧重于保护个体研究对象。然而,几位评论家认为,保护个体对象固然重要,但不足以确保研究符合伦理。保护参与健康研究的社区也至关重要。特别是,一些研究因剥削宿主社区而受到批评。尽管这些批评受到了广泛关注,但对于健康研究中社区剥削的构成要素,尚未进行系统分析,也没有评估需要哪些保障措施来防止这种情况。这是一个严重的缺陷。缺乏对社区剥削的分析,就无法确保宿主社区免受剥削。这种分析的缺失还增加了剥削指控可能阻碍重要研究的可能性,而且没有办法评估这些指控是否合理。本文试图通过分析社区剥削来解决这些问题,并在此分析的基础上,确定在健康研究中需要哪些保障措施来保护社区免受剥削。