Suppr超能文献

倍氯米松/福莫特罗与布地奈德/福莫特罗联合治疗哮喘的对比

Beclomethasone/formoterol versus budesonide/formoterol combination therapy in asthma.

作者信息

Papi A, Paggiaro P L, Nicolini G, Vignola A M, Fabbri L M

机构信息

Research Centre on Asthma and COPD, University of Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2007 Apr;29(4):682-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00095906. Epub 2006 Nov 15.

Abstract

The present study was designed to compare the fixed combination of beclomethasone and formoterol in a hydrofluoroalkane Modulite (Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italy) pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), with a combination of budesonide and formoterol administered via a Turbuhaler (AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden) dry powder inhaler (DPI). This was a phase III, multinational, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, two-arm parallel groups, controlled study design. After a 2-week run-in period, 219 patients with moderate-to-severe asthma were randomised to a 12-week treatment with beclomethasone 200 microg plus formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. delivered via a pMDI or budesonide 400 microg plus formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. delivered via a DPI. The analysis of noninferiority on primary outcome, morning peak expiratory flow in the last 2 weeks of treatment, showed no difference between groups. A statistically significant improvement from baseline in lung function, symptoms and rescue medication use was observed in both groups at all time-points. No differences were observed between treatments in either rate of asthma exacerbations or frequency of adverse events. The new fixed combination of beclomethasone and formoterol in hydrofluoroalkane Modulite pressurised metered-dose inhaler is equivalent to the marketed combination of budesonide and formoterol in terms of efficacy and tolerability profile.

摘要

本研究旨在比较氟氢烷烃Modulite(意大利帕尔马奇西制药公司)压力定量吸入器(pMDI)中倍氯米松与福莫特罗的固定组合,与通过都保(瑞典隆德阿斯利康公司)干粉吸入器(DPI)给药的布地奈德和福莫特罗组合。这是一项III期、多国、多中心、双盲、双模拟、随机、双臂平行组对照研究设计。经过2周的导入期后,219例中度至重度哮喘患者被随机分为两组,分别接受为期12周的治疗,一组通过pMDI吸入倍氯米松200微克加福莫特罗12微克,每日两次;另一组通过DPI吸入布地奈德400微克加福莫特罗12微克,每日两次。对主要结局(治疗最后2周的早晨呼气峰值流速)的非劣效性分析显示,两组之间无差异。在所有时间点,两组患者的肺功能、症状和急救药物使用情况与基线相比均有统计学意义的改善。在哮喘加重率或不良事件发生率方面,两种治疗方法之间未观察到差异。氟氢烷烃Modulite压力定量吸入器中倍氯米松与福莫特罗的新固定组合在疗效和耐受性方面与市售的布地奈德和福莫特罗组合相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验