Szydlowska Kinga, Kaminska Bozena, Baude Andrea, Parsons Chris G, Danysz Wojciech
Laboratory of Transcription Regulation, The Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Pasteur 3 Street, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2007 Jan 5;554(1):18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.09.061. Epub 2006 Oct 10.
The neuroprotective potential of allosteric mGlu5 and mGlu1 antagonists such as 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)-pyridin (MPEP)/[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP) and (3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl)-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate (EMQMCM), was tested in vitro in organotypic hippocampal cultures and in the middle cerebral artery occlusion model of stroke in vivo. Both classes of agent have high selectivity toward mGlu sub-types and are active in animal models of various diseases indicating satisfactory CNS penetration. In organotypic hippocampal cultures MPEP showed high neuroprotective potency against sub-chronic (12 days) insult produced by 3-NP with an IC50 of c.a. 70 nM. In contrast, although the mGlu1 antagonist EMQMCM was also protective, it seems to be weaker yielding an IC50 of c.a. 1 microM. Similarly, in the transient (90 min) middle cerebral artery occlusion model of ischaemia in rats, MTEP seems to be more effective than EMQMCM. MTEP, at 2.5 mg/kg and at 5 mg/kg provided 50 and 70% neuroprotection if injected 2 h after the onset of ischaemia. At a dose of 5 mg/kg, significant (50%) neuroprotection was also seen if the treatment was delayed by 4 h. EMQMCM was not protective at 5 mg/kg (given 2 h after occlusion) but at 10 mg/kg 50% of neuroprotection was observed. The present data support stronger neuroprotective potential of mGlu5 than mGlu1 antagonists.
变构代谢型谷氨酸受体5(mGlu5)和代谢型谷氨酸受体1(mGlu1)拮抗剂,如6-甲基-2-(苯乙炔基)吡啶(MPEP)/[(2-甲基-1,3-噻唑-4-基)乙炔基]吡啶(MTEP)和(3-乙基-2-甲基喹啉-6-基)-(4-甲氧基环己基)-甲酮甲磺酸盐(EMQMCM)的神经保护潜力,在体外的器官型海马培养物和体内的大脑中动脉闭塞性脑卒中模型中进行了测试。这两类药物对mGlu亚型均具有高选择性,并且在各种疾病的动物模型中均有活性,表明其具有令人满意的中枢神经系统渗透性。在器官型海马培养物中,MPEP对3-硝基丙酸(3-NP)产生的亚慢性(12天)损伤显示出高神经保护效力,IC50约为70 nM。相比之下,尽管mGlu1拮抗剂EMQMCM也具有保护作用,但似乎较弱,IC50约为1 μM。同样,在大鼠短暂性(90分钟)大脑中动脉缺血模型中,MTEP似乎比EMQMCM更有效。在缺血发作后2小时注射时,2.5 mg/kg和5 mg/kg的MTEP分别提供了50%和70%的神经保护作用。在5 mg/kg的剂量下,如果治疗延迟4小时,也能观察到显著的(50%)神经保护作用。EMQMCM在5 mg/kg(闭塞后2小时给药)时没有保护作用,但在10 mg/kg时观察到50%的神经保护作用。目前的数据支持mGlu5拮抗剂比mGlu1拮抗剂具有更强的神经保护潜力。