Ramakrishna Gautam, Breen Jerome F, Mulvagh Sharon L, McCully Robert B, Pellikka Patricia A
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Nov 21;48(10):2125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.105. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
The purpose of this study was to compare the results and prognostic value of electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT) and exercise echocardiography.
Although patients with elevated coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) might be referred for exercise echocardiography, the association of EBCT CACS with wall motion score index (WMSI) is not known.
Patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent both clinically indicated EBCT and exercise echocardiography within a 3-month period were identified. Exercise WMSI was based on a 16-segment model (normal = 1; abnormal >1). The EBCT CACS was derived with the Agatston scoring system. Follow-up was obtained for the combined end point of death and myocardial infarction.
The study population included 556 patients (age 54 +/- 10 years; 65% male). Correlation between EBCT CACS and exercise WMSI was limited (r = 0.17, p < 0.0001) but statistically significant. The proportion of patients with abnormal exercise WMSI increased with increasing CACS severity (chi-square = 19.1, p < 0.001). However, even in those with CACS >400, 66% had normal exercise WMSI. Age, CACS, and chest pain were independently associated with abnormal exercise WMSI. Events occurred in 12 (2%) patients. Wall motion score index (risk ratio [RR] 3.7, p = 0.023) and age (RR 1.9, p = 0.019) were associated with events.
Electron-beam computed tomography CACS was predictive of abnormal exercise WMSI, but the majority of patients with elevated CACS had normal WMSI. Wall motion score index and age were the best predictors of events. Prospective studies are indicated to establish the relative roles of these tests in risk stratification.
本研究旨在比较电子束计算机断层扫描(EBCT)和运动负荷超声心动图的结果及预后价值。
尽管冠状动脉钙化积分(CACS)升高的患者可能会接受运动负荷超声心动图检查,但EBCT CACS与室壁运动评分指数(WMSI)之间的关联尚不清楚。
确定在3个月内接受了临床指征的EBCT和运动负荷超声心动图检查且无已知冠状动脉疾病的患者。运动WMSI基于16节段模型(正常=1;异常>1)。EBCT CACS采用阿加斯顿评分系统得出。对死亡和心肌梗死的联合终点进行随访。
研究人群包括556例患者(年龄54±10岁;65%为男性)。EBCT CACS与运动WMSI之间的相关性有限(r = 0.17,p < 0.0001),但具有统计学意义。运动WMSI异常的患者比例随CACS严重程度增加而升高(卡方检验=19.1,p < 0.001)。然而,即使CACS>400的患者中,66%的运动WMSI仍正常。年龄、CACS和胸痛与运动WMSI异常独立相关。12例(2%)患者发生了事件。室壁运动评分指数(风险比[RR] 3.7,p = 0.023)和年龄(RR 1.9,p = 0.019)与事件相关。
电子束计算机断层扫描CACS可预测运动WMSI异常,但大多数CACS升高的患者WMSI正常。室壁运动评分指数和年龄是事件的最佳预测因素。需要进行前瞻性研究以确定这些检查在风险分层中的相对作用。