Ignjatovic Vera, Summerhayes Robyn, Gan Andrew, Than Jenny, Chan Anthony, Cochrane Andrew, Bennett Martin, Horton Stephen, Shann Frank, Lane Geoff, Ross-Smith Maree, Monagle Paul
Department of Clinical Haematology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Thromb Res. 2007;120(3):347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.10.006. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
Anti-Factor Xa (Anti-Xa) assays specifically determine the anticoagulant activity of UFH by measuring the ability of heparin-bound Antithrombin (AT) to inhibit a single enzyme, Factor Xa (FXa). Recent improvements in the automation, cost-effectiveness and accessibility of the assay to clinicians, have resulted in the Anti-Xa assay becoming a part of daily clinical practice in many institutions.
We hypothesized that different Anti-Xa assays have different applicability for use in clinical settings, depending on the amount of UFH administered. This was investigated in a tertiary paediatric institution.
Samples were collected from children receiving Low-dose of UFH of at least 10 IU/kg/h, with or without a previous bolus of up to 25 IU/kg/h, within the previous 6 h in the PICU and HDU. High-dose UFH population consisted of children undergoing Cardiac Catheterization (CC), who received a bolus of UFH of 100 IU/kg body weight, 30 min prior to sampling.
The Anti-Xa activity for a given dose of UFH was found to vary significantly based on the Anti-Xa assay and the population being monitored. Our study suggests that the MODIFIED COMATIC Anti-Xa assay provides the best physiological measure of the UFH effect in children, as it does not introduce sources of error, such as exogenous AT, which may increase the measured ant Factor Xa activity, nor Dextran Sulphate which can displace plasma protein bound heparin and once again leading to falsely elevated assay results. Further studies that include assessment of clinical outcomes are required to confirm the applicability of use of this particular assay in monitoring UFH therapy.
抗Xa因子(Anti-Xa)检测通过测量肝素结合的抗凝血酶(AT)抑制单一酶——Xa因子(FXa)的能力,专门用于测定普通肝素(UFH)的抗凝活性。该检测在自动化程度、成本效益以及临床医生可及性方面的最新改进,已使Anti-Xa检测成为许多机构日常临床实践的一部分。
我们假设,根据UFH的给药量不同,不同的Anti-Xa检测在临床环境中的适用性也不同。这在一家三级儿科机构进行了研究。
在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)和高依赖病房(HDU),收集在过去6小时内接受至少10 IU/kg/h低剂量UFH且有或无高达25 IU/kg/h初始推注剂量的儿童的样本。高剂量UFH组包括接受心脏导管插入术(CC)的儿童,他们在采样前30分钟接受了100 IU/kg体重的UFH推注。
发现对于给定剂量的UFH,Anti-Xa活性根据所使用的Anti-Xa检测方法和所监测的人群而有显著差异。我们的研究表明,改良的COMATIC Anti-Xa检测为儿童UFH效果提供了最佳的生理学测量方法,因为它不会引入误差来源,如可能增加测得的抗Xa因子活性的外源性AT,也不会引入可置换血浆蛋白结合肝素并再次导致检测结果假性升高的硫酸葡聚糖。需要进一步开展包括评估临床结局的研究,以确认该特定检测方法在监测UFH治疗中的适用性。