Deramond Hervé, Saliou Guillaume, Aveillan Mathieu, Lehmann Pierre, Vallée Jean Noël
Medical Imaging Department, Fort de France Teaching Hospitals, Pierre Zobda-Quitman Hospital, Boite postale 632, 97261 Fort de France, France (FWI).
Joint Bone Spine. 2006 Dec;73(6):610-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
Among individuals aged 50-80 years, 5-20% have one or more vertebral crush fractures. One-third of these patients require treatment for acute or chronic pain. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty were introduced over the last two decades as treatments for incapacitating pain from osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Both techniques proved effective and safe in numerous retrospective and prospective studies. They now deserve to be incorporated into the standard treatment strategy for painful and incapacitating vertebral fractures. Kyphoplasty seeks not only to stabilize the vertebra, but also to correct the kyphosis induced by the vertebral body collapse. However, the correction is often limited (less than 15 degrees ) and has not been shown to increase the benefits in terms of pain relief or quality-of-life improvement, compared to vertebroplasty. Kyphoplasty is more costly than vertebroplasty, which is therefore emerging as the treatment of choice. However, a randomized double-blind trial comparing vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty is needed. Furthermore, a randomized comparison of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty versus noninterventional treatment is needed in patients admitted for pain immediately after a vertebral crush fracture.
在50至80岁的人群中,5%至20%的人有一处或多处椎体压缩性骨折。其中三分之一的患者需要接受急性或慢性疼痛的治疗。椎体成形术和后凸成形术是在过去二十年中作为治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折所致失能性疼痛的方法而引入的。在众多回顾性和前瞻性研究中,这两种技术都被证明是有效且安全的。它们现在理应被纳入疼痛性和失能性椎体骨折的标准治疗策略中。后凸成形术不仅旨在稳定椎体,还试图纠正椎体塌陷引起的后凸畸形。然而,与椎体成形术相比,这种矫正通常有限(小于15度),并且在缓解疼痛或改善生活质量方面并未显示出更大的益处。后凸成形术比椎体成形术成本更高,因此椎体成形术正成为首选治疗方法。然而,需要进行一项比较椎体成形术和后凸成形术的随机双盲试验。此外,对于椎体压缩性骨折后立即因疼痛入院的患者,需要对椎体成形术或后凸成形术与非介入治疗进行随机比较。