Uller Tobias, Olsson Mats
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2522 New South Wales, Australia.
Evolution. 2006 Oct;60(10):2131-6.
Sex allocation theory predicts that mothers should adjust their sex-specific reproductive investment in relation to the predicted fitness returns from sons versus daughters. Sex allocation theory has proved to be successful in some invertebrate taxa but data on vertebrates often fail to show the predicted shift in sex ratio or sex-specific resource investment. This is likely to be partly explained by simplistic assumptions of vertebrate life-history and mechanistic constraints, but also because the fundamental assumption of sex-specific fitness return on investment is rarely supported by empirical data. In short-lived species, the time of hatching or parturition can have a strong impact on the age and size at maturity. Thus, if selection favors adult sexual-size dimorphism, females can maximize their fitness by adjusting offspring sex over the reproductive season. We show that in mallee dragons, Ctenophorus fordi, date of hatching is positively related to female reproductive output but has little, if any, effect on male reproductive success, suggesting selection for a seasonal shift in offspring sex ratio. We used a combination of field and laboratory data collected over two years to test if female dragons adjust their sex allocation over the season to ensure an adaptive match between time of hatching and offspring sex. Contrary to our predictions, we found no effect of laying date on sex ratio, nor did we find any evidence for within-female between-clutch sex-ratio adjustment. Furthermore, there was no differential resource investment into male and female offspring within or between clutches and sex ratios did not correlate with female condition or any partner traits. Consequently, despite evidence for selection for a seasonal sex-ratio shift, female mallee dragons do not seem to exercise any control over sex determination. The results are discussed in relation to potential constraints on sex-ratio adjustment, alternative selection pressures, and the evolution of temperature-dependent sex determination.
性分配理论预测,母亲应根据儿子和女儿预期的适合度回报来调整其特定性别的生殖投资。性分配理论已在一些无脊椎动物类群中得到验证,但脊椎动物的数据往往未能显示出预期的性别比例或特定性别的资源投资变化。这可能部分是由于对脊椎动物生活史的简单假设和机械限制,但也因为特定性别投资的适合度回报这一基本假设很少得到实证数据的支持。在短命物种中,孵化或分娩时间会对成熟时的年龄和体型产生重大影响。因此,如果选择有利于成年期的两性体型差异,雌性可以通过在繁殖季节调整后代性别来最大化其适合度。我们发现,在马利鬃狮蜥(Ctenophorus fordi)中,孵化日期与雌性生殖产出呈正相关,但对雄性生殖成功率影响甚微,这表明存在对后代性别比例季节性变化的选择。我们结合了两年间收集的野外和实验室数据,以测试雌性鬃狮蜥是否会在季节内调整其性分配,以确保孵化时间与后代性别之间的适应性匹配。与我们的预测相反,我们发现产卵日期对性别比例没有影响,也没有发现雌性在不同窝之间调整性别比例的证据。此外,在窝内或窝间,对雄性和雌性后代没有差异资源投资,性别比例与雌性状况或任何配偶特征也没有相关性。因此,尽管有证据表明存在对季节性性别比例变化的选择,但雌性马利鬃狮蜥似乎并未对性别决定进行任何控制。我们将结合性别比例调整的潜在限制、其他选择压力以及温度依赖性性别决定的进化来讨论这些结果。