Feldman Dmitriy N, Gade Christopher L, Slotwiner Alexander J, Parikh Manish, Bergman Geoffrey, Wong S Chiu, Minutello Robert M
Division of Cardiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 15;98(10):1334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.026. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
Octogenarians have been under-represented in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials despite an increase in referrals for PCI. As the United States population ages, the number of high-risk PCIs in the elderly will continue to increase. This study investigated the effect of age on short-term prognosis after PCI in 3 age groups. Using the 2000/2001 New York State Angioplasty Registry, we compared in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; death, stroke, or coronary artery bypass grafting) in emergency and elective PCI cohorts across 3 age categories of patients: 10,964 patients who underwent emergency PCI (<60 years of age, n = 5,354; 60 to 80 years of age, n = 4,939; >80 years of age, n = 671) and 71,176 patients who underwent elective PCI (<60 years of age, n = 24,525; 60 to 80 years of age, n = 40,869; >80 years of age, n = 5,782). Patients were considered to have undergone an emergency PCI if they had an acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours, had thrombolytic therapy within 7 days, or presented with hemodynamic instability or shock. Elderly patients had more co-morbidities, including more extensive coronary atherosclerosis, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and renal insufficiency, and presented more frequently with hemodynamic instability or shock. In the emergency PCI group, in-hospital mortality (1.0% vs 4.1% vs 11.5%, p <0.05) and MACEs (1.6% vs 5.2% vs 13.1%, p <0.05) increased incrementally by age group. In the elective PCI group, rates of in-hospital complications were considerably lower, with an incremental increase in mortality (0.1% vs 0.4% vs 1.1%, p <0.05) and MACEs (0.4% vs 0.7% vs 1.6%, p <0.05). Age was strongly predictive of in-hospital mortality for emergency and elective PCI by multivariate analysis. In conclusion, elective PCI in the elderly has favorable outcome and acceptable short-term mortality in the stent era. Elderly patients, in particular octogenarians undergoing emergency PCI, have a substantially higher risk of in-hospital death.
尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)转诊数量有所增加,但八旬老人在PCI试验中的代表性不足。随着美国人口老龄化,老年高危PCI的数量将继续增加。本研究调查了年龄对3个年龄组PCI术后短期预后的影响。利用2000/2001年纽约州血管成形术登记处的数据,我们比较了3个年龄组患者的急诊和择期PCI队列中的住院死亡率和主要不良心脏事件(MACE;死亡、中风或冠状动脉旁路移植术):10964例接受急诊PCI的患者(<60岁,n = 5354;60至80岁,n = 4939;>80岁,n = 671)和71176例接受择期PCI的患者(<60岁,n = 24525;60至80岁,n = 40869;>80岁,n = 5782)。如果患者在24小时内发生急性心肌梗死、在7天内接受溶栓治疗或出现血流动力学不稳定或休克,则被视为接受了急诊PCI。老年患者有更多的合并症,包括更广泛的冠状动脉粥样硬化、高血压、外周血管疾病和肾功能不全,并且更频繁地出现血流动力学不稳定或休克。在急诊PCI组中,住院死亡率(1.0%对4.1%对11.5%,p<0.05)和MACE(1.6%对5.2%对13.1%,p<0.05)按年龄组递增。在择期PCI组中,住院并发症发生率相当低,死亡率(0.1%对0.4%对1.1%,p<0.05)和MACE(0.4%对0.7%对1.6%,p<0.05)递增。多因素分析显示,年龄对急诊和择期PCI的住院死亡率有很强的预测性。总之,在支架时代,老年患者的择期PCI有良好的预后和可接受的短期死亡率。老年患者,尤其是接受急诊PCI的八旬老人,住院死亡风险显著更高。