Abhayaratna Walter P, Barnes Marion E, O'Rourke Michael F, Gersh Bernard J, Seward James B, Miyasaka Yoko, Bailey Kent R, Tsang Teresa S M
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 15;98(10):1387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.035. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
There is a paucity of data regarding the relation between the various noninvasive indexes of arterial stiffness and left ventricular diastolic function. In 188 subjects aged > or =65 years (mean 75 +/- 5; 71% men), the concordance and strength of the association between measures of arterial stiffness and left ventricular diastolic function were evaluated. Indexes of arterial stiffness (brachial and aortic pulse pressure [PP], carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity [PWV], and augmentation pressure [AP]) were measured using applanation tonometry. Diastolic function was classified in terms of instantaneous diastolic function grade and quantitated as left atrial volume, a measure of chronic diastolic burden. Risk for new cardiovascular events was estimated using a validated clinical echocardiographic risk algorithm. Aortic and brachial PP, PWV, and AP were correlated positively with left atrial volume and diastolic function grade. After adjusting for age, gender, and clinical and echocardiographic covariates, 1-SD increases in aortic PP, brachial PP, PWV, and AP were associated with 6%, 6%, 4%, and 4% increases in indexed left atrial volume, respectively. Similarly, 1-SD increases in aortic PP, brachial PP, and AP were associated with 84%, 81%, and 83% increased risk for diastolic dysfunction, respectively (all p <0.04). PWV and aortic and brachial PP were superior to AP in discriminating subjects with the highest risk of having new cardiovascular events (5-year risk >50%; area under receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.67, 0.67, 0.70, and 0.56, respectively; p <0.05). In conclusion, increased arterial stiffness was associated with more severe left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, although the strength of the association varied according to the specific measure used. Aortic PP, brachial PP, and PWV appeared superior to AP in risk discrimination in this elderly cohort.
关于动脉僵硬度的各种非侵入性指标与左心室舒张功能之间的关系,目前数据匮乏。在188名年龄≥65岁(平均75±5岁;71%为男性)的受试者中,评估了动脉僵硬度指标与左心室舒张功能之间关联的一致性和强度。采用压平式眼压计测量动脉僵硬度指标(肱动脉和主动脉脉压[PP]、颈股动脉脉搏波速度[PWV]和增压[AP])。根据瞬时舒张功能分级对舒张功能进行分类,并将左心房容积作为慢性舒张负担的指标进行量化。使用经过验证的临床超声心动图风险算法评估新发心血管事件的风险。主动脉和肱动脉PP、PWV和AP与左心房容积和舒张功能分级呈正相关。在调整年龄、性别以及临床和超声心动图协变量后,主动脉PP、肱动脉PP、PWV和AP每增加1个标准差,分别与左心房容积指数增加6%、6%、4%和4%相关。同样,主动脉PP、肱动脉PP和AP每增加1个标准差,分别与舒张功能障碍风险增加84%、81%和83%相关(均p<0.04)。在区分发生新发心血管事件风险最高的受试者(5年风险>50%)方面,PWV以及主动脉和肱动脉PP优于AP(受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.67、0.67、0.70和0.56;p<0.05)。总之,动脉僵硬度增加与更严重的左心室舒张功能障碍相关,尽管这种关联的强度因所使用的具体测量指标而异。在这个老年队列中,主动脉PP、肱动脉PP和PWV在风险判别方面似乎优于AP。