González-Ortiz M, Martínez-Abundis E, Jacques-Camarena O, Hernández-González S O, Valera-González I G, Ramos-Zavala M G
Medical Research Unit in Clinical Epidemiology, Hospital of Specialties, Medical Unit of High Specialty, West National Medical Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Acta Diabetol. 2006 Nov;43(3):84-6. doi: 10.1007/s00592-006-0218-2.
The aim was to compare the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III criteria with the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definition of metabolic syndrome (MS) in adults with excess adiposity who were considered a high-risk population. A cross-sectional study was carried out in 274 adults with excess adiposity. MS was assessed in all volunteers considering the ATP III criteria and the new IDF definition. Among all individuals, 130 (47%) were similarly classified under the two definitions. Under the ATP III criteria, but not the IDF definition, 2 (1%) participants had MS, and 29 (11%) subjects had MS under the IDF definition but not the ATP III criteria (p=0.009). The ATP III criteria and the IDF definition were useful for identifying MS in adults with excess of adiposity; however, the IDF proposal identified a greater percentage of patients.
目的是比较成人治疗小组(ATP)III标准与国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)对肥胖成人代谢综合征(MS)的定义,这些肥胖成人被视为高危人群。对274名肥胖成人进行了一项横断面研究。根据ATP III标准和新的IDF定义对所有志愿者进行MS评估。在所有个体中,130名(47%)在两种定义下分类相同。根据ATP III标准但不符合IDF定义,有2名(1%)参与者患有MS,而根据IDF定义但不符合ATP III标准有29名(11%)受试者患有MS(p=0.009)。ATP III标准和IDF定义对于识别肥胖成人中的MS很有用;然而,IDF的提议识别出的患者比例更高。