Suppr超能文献

经闭孔吊带术与经尿道中段吊带术治疗后的逼尿肌过度活动和急迫性尿失禁

Detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence following trans obturator versus midurethral slings.

作者信息

Botros Sylvia M, Miller Jay-James R, Goldberg Roger P, Gandhi Sanjay, Akl Mohammed, Beaumont Jennifer L, Sand Peter K

机构信息

Evanston Continence Center, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):42-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.20377.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare the rates of resolution of detrusor overactivity (DO) and subjective urge urinary incontinence (UUI) as well as de novo DO and UUI between the Monarc, TVT, and SPARC midurethral sling procedures.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-six subjects with urodynamic stress or mixed urinary incontinence underwent retropubic midurethral slings (TVT, N = 99; SPARC, N = 52) or transobturator slings (Monarc, N = 125). All evaluable subjects had a routine office evaluation, subjective assessment of UUI, and multichannel urodynamic testing pre- and 3 months postoperatively. Comparisons were made using Student's t-test, ANOVA, McNemar's test, and Chi-Square test where appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to detect possible confounding factors such as sling type, and differences in concomitant surgical procedures.

RESULTS

De novo subjective UUI differed significantly between the Monarc and the other two slings (33% TVT vs. 8% Monarc vs. 17% SPARC, P = 0.04). Fourteen to Sixteen percents of patients with preoperative UUI who underwent TVT or SPARC had worsening of their UUI symptoms while only 6% of the Monarc group did (P = 0.02). There was no difference in rates of resolution of DO among the three groups (40% vs. 48% vs. 32%, P = 0.39) or de novo DO (32% vs. 22% vs. 22%, P = 0.64) at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo transobturator procedures have significantly lower rates of de novo UUI than those who undergo midurethral sling procedures. Rates of resolution of DO, UUI, and de novo DO do not differ between groups.

摘要

目的

比较Monarc、TVT和SPARC三种经尿道中段吊带手术中逼尿肌过度活动(DO)和主观急迫性尿失禁(UUI)的缓解率,以及新发DO和UUI的发生率。

方法

276例存在尿动力学压力性或混合性尿失禁的受试者接受耻骨后经尿道中段吊带手术(TVT,n = 99;SPARC,n = 52)或经闭孔吊带手术(Monarc,n = 125)。所有可评估的受试者在术前和术后3个月进行常规门诊评估、UUI主观评估以及多通道尿动力学检测。在适当情况下,使用学生t检验、方差分析、McNemar检验和卡方检验进行比较。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以检测可能的混杂因素,如吊带类型以及同期手术操作的差异。

结果

Monarc与其他两种吊带相比,新发主观UUI有显著差异(TVT为33%,Monarc为8%,SPARC为17%,P = 0.04)。接受TVT或SPARC手术的术前UUI患者中有14%至16%的患者UUI症状恶化,而Monarc组仅有6%(P = 0.02)。三组之间DO的缓解率(40%对48%对32%,P = 0.39)或新发DO的发生率(32%对22%对22%,P = 0.64)在3个月时无差异。

结论

接受经闭孔手术的患者新发UUI的发生率显著低于接受经尿道中段吊带手术的患者。各组之间DO、UUI和新发DO的缓解率无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验