相似文献
1
PLoS Medicine and the pharmaceutical industry.
PLoS Med. 2006 Jul;3(7):e329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030329.
2
Bold suggestion by Smith.
PLoS Med. 2005 Jul;2(7):e226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020226. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
3
Little fish are less likely to take the bait.
PLoS Med. 2005 Jul;2(7):e221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020221. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
4
Focus on the funding and production of evidence rather than its publication.
PLoS Med. 2005 Jul;2(7):e222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020222. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
5
Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies.
PLoS Med. 2005 May;2(5):e138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020138. Epub 2005 May 17.
6
Medical journals, academia, and industry-sponsored clinical trials.
PLoS Med. 2005 Jul;2(7):e218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020218. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
7
Bitter pills and puffed trials.
PLoS Med. 2005 Jul;2(7):e219; discussion e225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020219. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
8
[Who is to be trusted? On press reporters' assignments and agendas].
Lakartidningen. 2002 Dec 12;99(50):5110-2.
9
[Why this arrogance, Josef Milerad?].
Lakartidningen. 2003 Jan 23;100(4):254-5.
10
[Shoot the messenger!--or the art of changing the subject of conversation].
Lakartidningen. 2003 Jan 23;100(4):252-3.
引用本文的文献
1
Marketing of medicines in primary care: An analysis of direct marketing mailings and advertisements.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 28;18(8):e0290603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290603. eCollection 2023.
Zotero 插件