Pate Gordon E, Lee May, Humphries Karin, Cohen Eric, Lowe Robert, Fox Rebecca S, Teskey Robert, Buller Christopher E
Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Can J Cardiol. 2006 Dec;22(14):1223-9. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70963-1.
Reports addressing treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) are principally derived from clinical trials.
To characterize the spectrum of ISR in an unselected population, and to explore clinical and angiographic factors determining management.
During a prespecified six-month period before the introduction of drug-eluting stents, consecutive cases of ISR that were identified during clinically driven cardiac catheterization at five hospitals offering all approved treatment modalities for ISR were prospectively registered.
ISR was identified in 363 patients; 301 (84%) had one ISR lesion and 62 (16%) had multiple lesions. Unstable clinical presentations accounted for 51%, including 15% with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The median interval (25th, 75th percentiles) from stent insertion to angiographic diagnosis of ISR was eight months (Q1,Q3: 4,15), with a median stented length of 18 mm (Q1,Q3: 15,28). The majority of lesions (60%) displayed a diffuse ISR pattern (Mehran types 2 and 3). ISR type was independent of time to re-presentation, diabetes, arterial territory and total stent length. Treatment included percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone (n=139 [38%]), PCI with brachytherapy (n=105 [29%]), medical therapy (n=60 [17%]) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=59 [16%]). Medical therapy was associated with small vessel size and recurrent ISR, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery was associated with multiple lesions, as well as diffuse, occlusive and recurrent ISR. For patients treated percutaneously, PCI treatment alone was more common for focal restenosis and after ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and brachytherapy was the more common treatment for diffuse and recurrent ISR, and stable angina.
These data provide a benchmark description of the spectrum of ISR with which the impact of drug-eluting stents may be compared and better understood.
关于支架内再狭窄(ISR)治疗的报告主要来自临床试验。
描述未选择人群中ISR的范围,并探讨决定治疗方案的临床和血管造影因素。
在药物洗脱支架引入前预先设定的六个月期间,对五家提供所有批准的ISR治疗方式的医院在临床驱动的心脏导管插入术中识别出的连续ISR病例进行前瞻性登记。
363例患者被诊断为ISR;301例(84%)有一处ISR病变,62例(16%)有多处病变。不稳定临床表现占51%,其中15%为ST段抬高型心肌梗死。从支架置入到血管造影诊断ISR的中位间隔时间(第25、75百分位数)为8个月(第一四分位数,第三四分位数:4,15),支架置入长度中位数为18 mm(第一四分位数,第三四分位数:15,28)。大多数病变(60%)表现为弥漫性ISR模式(梅兰2型和3型)。ISR类型与再次就诊时间、糖尿病、动脉区域和总支架长度无关。治疗方法包括单纯经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)(n = 139 [38%])、PCI联合近距离放射治疗(n = 105 [29%])、药物治疗(n = 60 [17%])和冠状动脉旁路移植术(n = 59 [16%])。药物治疗与血管直径小和复发性ISR相关,冠状动脉旁路移植术与多处病变以及弥漫性、闭塞性和复发性ISR相关。对于接受经皮治疗的患者,单纯PCI治疗在局灶性再狭窄和ST段抬高型心肌梗死后更为常见,近距离放射治疗在弥漫性和复发性ISR以及稳定型心绞痛中更为常见。
这些数据提供了ISR范围的基准描述,可用于比较和更好地理解药物洗脱支架的影响。