Huang Shie-Shian, Lee Ming-Hsun, Leu Hsieh-Shong
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2006 Dec;39(6):496-502.
Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella and Escherichia coli. However, controversy exists about the antibiotic choice for infections due to ESBL-producing organisms of other genera.
This retrospective study evaluated the risk factors and outcomes of 54 adult patients with bacteremia due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae other than Klebsiella spp. or E. coli treated at a tertiary care hospital in northern Taiwan from January 2001-December 2003. Patients were categorized into carbapenem (n = 22) and non-carbapenem (n = 32) treatment groups. All patients had at least one positive blood culture together with fever or other clinical features compatible with systemic infection.
Higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, glucocorticoid use, and presentation of septic shock were significant risk factors for mortality (p<0.05). Patients treated with a carbapenem had a better 14-day or overall survival rate (i.e., survived to discharge) than those treated with non-carbapenem antibiotics, although this difference was not significant. Among patients in the non-carbapenem group, the overall survival rates of ciprofloxacin, aminoglycoside, and ceftazidime were 70% (14/20), 62.5% (5/8), and 50% (2/4), respectively (p=0.877). The overall survival rates of the carbapenem (72.7%) and ciprofloxacin (70.0%) groups were similar.
The results suggest that ciprofloxacin, when indicated based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing, may serve as an alternative choice for infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae other than E. coli or Klebsiella spp. and may not affect the clinical outcome at discharge.
碳青霉烯类药物被视为治疗由产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的克雷伯菌属和大肠埃希菌引起的严重感染的首选药物。然而,对于由其他菌属的产ESBL生物体引起的感染,抗生素的选择存在争议。
这项回顾性研究评估了2001年1月至2003年12月在台湾北部一家三级医疗中心接受治疗的54例由非克雷伯菌属或大肠埃希菌的产ESBL肠杆菌科细菌引起菌血症的成年患者的危险因素和结局。患者被分为碳青霉烯类治疗组(n = 22)和非碳青霉烯类治疗组(n = 32)。所有患者至少有一次血培养阳性,并伴有发热或其他与全身感染相符的临床特征。
急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II评分较高、使用糖皮质激素以及出现感染性休克是死亡的重要危险因素(p<0.05)。接受碳青霉烯类治疗的患者14天或总体生存率(即存活至出院)优于接受非碳青霉烯类抗生素治疗的患者,尽管这种差异不显著。在非碳青霉烯类治疗组患者中,环丙沙星、氨基糖苷类和头孢他啶的总体生存率分别为70%(14/20)、62.5%(5/8)和50%(2/4)(p = 0.877)。碳青霉烯类治疗组(72.7%)和环丙沙星治疗组(70.0%)的总体生存率相似。
结果表明,根据药敏试验结果选用环丙沙星时,它可能是由非大肠埃希菌或克雷伯菌属的产ESBL肠杆菌科细菌引起感染的替代选择,且可能不影响出院时的临床结局。