Goldberg Ronald B, Guyton John R, Mazzone Theodore, Weinstock Ruth S, Polis Adam, Edwards Patricia, Tomassini Joanne E, Tershakovec Andrew M
Diabetes Research Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1450 NW 10th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Dec;81(12):1579-88. doi: 10.4065/81.12.1579.
To compare the efficacy and safety of the recommended usual starting and next highest doses of ezetimibe/ simvastatin and atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia.
This double-blind, multicenter study (June 22 to December 7, 2005) consisted of adult patients randomized to the recommended usual starting (ezetimibe/simvastatin, 10/20 mg/d, vs atorvastatin, 10 or 20 mg/d) or next highest (ezetimibe/simvastatin, 10/40 mg/d, vs atorvastatin, 40 mg/d) doses. Efficacy end points included percent changes from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (primary) and proportion of patients attaining LDL-C levels less than 70 mg/dL (secondary).
A total of 1229 patients participated in the study. Significantly greater mean reductions were found in LDL-C levels with ezetimibe/simvastatin, 10/20 mg/d (-53.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -55.4% to -51.8%), than with atorvastatin, 10 mg/d (-38.3%; 95% CI, -40.1% to -36.5%; P < .001) or 20 mg/d (-44.6%; 95% CI, -46.4% to -42.8%; P < .001), and with ezetimibe/simvastatin, 10/40 mg/d (-57.6%; 95% CI, -59.4% to -55.8%), vs atorvastatin, 40 mg/d (-50.9%; 95% CI, -52.7% to -49.1%; P < .001). Ezetimibe/simvastatin was also superior to atorvastatin in attainment of LDL-C levels less than 70 mg/dL (P < .001 for all dose comparisons). Significantly better improvements with ezetimibe/simvastatin than with atorvastatin (P < or = .001) were observed for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Ezetimibe/ simvastatin, 10/20 mg/d, reduced high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and triglyceride levels significantly more than atorvastatin, 10 mg/d (P = .02), with comparable reductions at other doses. Incidences of clinical adverse events, including serious drug-related and prespecified gastrointestinal-, gallbladder-, and hepatitis-related allergic reactions or rash events, and laboratory adverse events, including repeated elevation of hepatic transaminases or creatine kinase levels, were similar for both treatments.
Ezetimibe/simvastatin provided additional lipid-modifying benefits over atorvastatin monotherapy at the recommended usual starting and next highest doses in patients with type 2 diabetes. Both treatments were generally well tolerated.
比较依折麦布/辛伐他汀和阿托伐他汀推荐的常用起始剂量及次高剂量在2型糖尿病合并高胆固醇血症患者中的疗效和安全性。
这项双盲、多中心研究(2005年6月22日至12月7日)纳入成年患者,随机分为推荐的常用起始剂量组(依折麦布/辛伐他汀,10/20毫克/天,与阿托伐他汀,10或20毫克/天)或次高剂量组(依折麦布/辛伐他汀,10/40毫克/天,与阿托伐他汀,40毫克/天)。疗效终点包括低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平相对于基线的变化百分比(主要终点)以及达到LDL-C水平低于70毫克/分升的患者比例(次要终点)。
共有1229名患者参与研究。与阿托伐他汀10毫克/天(-38.3%;95%置信区间[CI],-40.1%至-36.5%;P <.001)或20毫克/天(-44.6%;95%CI,-46.4%至-42.8%;P <.001)相比,依折麦布/辛伐他汀10/20毫克/天组LDL-C水平的平均降低幅度显著更大(-53.6%;95%CI,-55.4%至-51.8%);与阿托伐他汀40毫克/天(-50.9%;95%CI,-52.7%至-49.1%;P <.001)相比,依折麦布/辛伐他汀10/40毫克/天组LDL-C水平的平均降低幅度也显著更大(-57.6%;95%CI,-59.4%至-55.8%)。在达到LDL-C水平低于70毫克/分升方面,依折麦布/辛伐他汀也优于阿托伐他汀(所有剂量比较P <.001)。在总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇方面,依折麦布/辛伐他汀的改善明显优于阿托伐他汀(P≤.001)。依折麦布/辛伐他汀10/20毫克/天组降低高敏C反应蛋白和甘油三酯水平的幅度显著大于阿托伐他汀10毫克/天组(P = .02),其他剂量下降低幅度相当。两种治疗的临床不良事件发生率相似,包括严重的药物相关及预先设定的胃肠道、胆囊和肝炎相关过敏反应或皮疹事件,以及实验室不良事件,包括肝转氨酶或肌酸激酶水平反复升高。
在2型糖尿病患者中,依折麦布/辛伐他汀在推荐的常用起始剂量及次高剂量时,相较于阿托伐他汀单药治疗具有额外的调脂益处。两种治疗总体耐受性良好。