Fabre Ludovic, Lemaire Patrick, Grainger Jonathan
Université de Provence and CNRS, 3 place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille cedex 3, France.
Cognition. 2007 Dec;105(3):513-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
Three experiments examined the effects of temporal attention and aging on masked repetition and categorical priming for numbers and words. Participants' temporal attention was manipulated by varying the stimulus onset asynchrony (i.e., constant or variable SOA). In Experiment 1, participants performed a parity judgment task and a lexical decision task in which categorical priming and repetition priming were, respectively, tested. Experiment 2 used a semantic categorization task testing categorical priming. In Experiment 3, repetition and categorical priming were tested in the same semantic categorization task with the same stimuli. The results of the three experiments showed that masked repetition priming is insensitive to manipulations of temporal attention whereas categorical priming is. Furthermore, no differences were found between young and older adults in repetition priming effects, again contrasting with the categorical priming results for which older adults were more sensitive to attentional manipulations than young adults.
三项实验研究了时间注意力和衰老对数字与单词的掩蔽重复启动和范畴启动的影响。通过改变刺激呈现异步性(即固定或可变的刺激呈现间隔)来操纵参与者的时间注意力。在实验1中,参与者执行奇偶判断任务和词汇判断任务,分别测试范畴启动和重复启动。实验2使用语义分类任务来测试范畴启动。在实验3中,在相同的语义分类任务中使用相同的刺激来测试重复启动和范畴启动。三项实验的结果表明,掩蔽重复启动对时间注意力的操纵不敏感,而范畴启动则敏感。此外,在重复启动效应方面,年轻人和老年人之间未发现差异,这再次与范畴启动的结果形成对比,在范畴启动中,老年人比年轻人对注意力操纵更敏感。