Matalon Shlomo, Feuerstein Osnat, Calderon Shlomo, Mittleman Avraham, Kaffe Israel
Department of Oral Rehabilitation Dentistry, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Jan;103(1):109-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.023. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
A new diagnostic method for detecting cavitated carious lesions in approximal surfaces with the aid of an ultrasonic caries detector (UCD) was tested for clinical use. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and clinical performance of the UCD system and to compare it with bite-wing radiography by using direct visual inspection during restoration preparation as a validation method.
One hundred ninety-seven directly inspected approximal sites, 95 as cavitated carious lesions and 102 as intact sites, of adults 22 to 45 years of age were examined by UCD and radiography.
Ultrasonic caries detector sensitivity was 0.82 compared with 0.75 for bite-wing radiographs when the threshold was determined as radiolucency in inner enamel and dentin, and 0.49 when the threshold of radiolucency was in dentin. The specificity of UCD was 0.75 versus 0.9 for radiographs.
The UCD exhibited a higher sensitivity than the radiographs but a lower specificity. This study presents a new diagnostic tool that can reduce patient exposure to ionizing radiation and improve caries detection.
测试一种借助超声波龋齿探测器(UCD)检测邻面龋洞性龋损的新诊断方法在临床中的应用。本研究的目的是评估UCD系统的有效性和临床性能,并在修复体预备期间通过直接目视检查作为验证方法,将其与咬合翼片X线摄影进行比较。
对197个22至45岁成年人的邻面部位进行直接检查,其中95个为龋洞性龋损部位,102个为完好部位,采用UCD和X线摄影进行检查。
当阈值确定为内釉质和牙本质中的透射区时,超声波龋齿探测器的灵敏度为0.82,咬合翼片X线摄影的灵敏度为0.75;当透射区阈值位于牙本质时,UCD的灵敏度为0.49。UCD的特异性为0.75,而X线摄影的特异性为0.9。
UCD的灵敏度高于X线摄影,但特异性较低。本研究提出了一种新的诊断工具,可减少患者接受电离辐射的剂量并改善龋齿检测。