Suppr超能文献

量化欧洲前阿尔卑斯山一个自然公园兰花植物群的相对灭绝风险并确定干预目标。

Quantifying relative extinction risks and targeting intervention for the orchid flora of a natural park in the European preAlps.

作者信息

Pierce Simon, Ceriani Roberta M, Villa Mauro, Cerabolini Bruno

机构信息

Dipartimento di Biologia Strutturale e Funzionale, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Via J.H. Dunant 3, I-21100 Varese, Italy.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2006 Dec;20(6):1804-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00539.x.

Abstract

Conservation currently relies largely on hindsight because demographic studies identify population decline after the event. Nevertheless, the degree of aggregation within a population is an "instantaneous" characteristic with the potential to identify populations presently at greatest risk of genetic impoverishment (via Allee effects and in-breeding depression) and local decline. We sought to determine the relative extinction risk for sympatric orchid species throughout Monte Barro natural park (Lecco, Italy), based on an index of dispersion (I) calculated from the size and location of subpopulations (recorded with GPS and mapped with GIS). Three population dispersion types were identified: (1) highly aggregated and locally abundant (large subpopulations restricted to particular sites; e.g., Gymnadenia conopsea [L.] R.Br.; I=54.5); (2) widespread and moderately aggregated (opportunistic throughout the elevational range of the mountain; e.g., Listera ovata[L.] R.Br.; I=18.9); and (3) weakly aggregated and locally rare (small, highly diffuse subpopulations; e.g., endemic Ophrys benacensis [Reisigl] O. & E. Danesch & Ehrend.; I=4.4). Type 1 populations are more likely to respond to in situ intervention, whereas type 2 are relatively invasive species for which conservation intervention is not necessary, and type 3 are rare species that are least likely to respond to habitat management, for which ex situ conservation and population reinforcement would be most appropriate. Although our methodology provides only a "snapshot" of aboveground patterns of population dispersion, it can help target the application of in situ and ex situ conservation activities proactively and is of particular utility for parks for which a rapid assessment of local extinction risks is needed.

摘要

目前,保护工作在很大程度上依赖于事后诸葛亮,因为人口统计学研究在事件发生后才确定种群数量下降。然而,种群内部的聚集程度是一种“即时”特征,有可能识别出目前面临遗传贫困(通过阿利效应和近亲繁殖衰退)和局部衰退风险最大的种群。我们试图根据从亚种群的大小和位置计算得出的离散度指数(I),来确定整个蒙特巴罗自然公园(意大利莱科)内同域分布的兰花物种的相对灭绝风险(亚种群的大小和位置通过GPS记录并用GIS绘制)。确定了三种种群离散类型:(1)高度聚集且局部丰富(大型亚种群局限于特定地点;例如,康诺普香兰[L.] R.Br.;I = 54.5);(2)广泛分布且聚集程度中等(在山脉的整个海拔范围内随机分布;例如,卵叶对叶兰[L.] R.Br.;I = 18.9);以及(3)聚集程度弱且局部稀少(小的、高度分散的亚种群;例如,特有种贝纳卡角盘兰[Reisigl] O. & E. Danesch & Ehrend.;I = 4.4)。第1类种群对原地干预的反应更有可能,而第2类是相对具有入侵性的物种,不需要进行保护干预,第3类是稀有物种,对栖息地管理的反应可能性最小,对于这类物种,迁地保护和种群增强最为合适。虽然我们的方法仅提供了种群离散地上模式的“快照”,但它可以帮助主动确定原地和迁地保护活动的应用目标,对于需要快速评估当地灭绝风险的公园特别有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验