Aubert J E, Husson B, Sarramone N
Laboratoire Matériaux et Durabilité des Constructions (LMDC), INSA-UPS, 135 Avenue de Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, France.
J Hazard Mater. 2007 Jul 19;146(1-2):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.11.044. Epub 2006 Nov 25.
This second of two articles dealing with the utilization of MSWI fly ash in blended cement studies the effects of two variants of the stabilization process on the behavior of the treated fly ash (TFA) introduced into cement-based mortars. From a technological point of view, the modifications of the process are very efficient and eliminate the swelling produced by the introduction of MSWI fly ash in cement-based mortars. TFA has a significant activity in cement-based mortars and can also advantageously replace a part of the cement in cement-based material. From an environmental point of view, the results of traditional leaching tests on monolithic and crushed mortars highlight a poor stabilization of some harmful elements such as antimony and chromium. The use of a cement rich in ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) with a view to stabilizing the chromium is not efficient. Since neither adequate tests nor quality criteria exist to evaluate the pollutant potential of a waste with a view to reusing it, it is difficult to conclude on the environmental soundness of such a practice. Further experiments are necessary to investigate the environmental impact of TFA introduced in cement-based mortars depending on the reuse scenario.
这是关于在混合水泥中利用城市固体废弃物焚烧(MSWI)飞灰的两篇文章中的第二篇,研究了两种稳定化处理工艺变体对引入水泥基砂浆中的处理后飞灰(TFA)性能的影响。从技术角度来看,工艺的改进非常有效,消除了在水泥基砂浆中引入MSWI飞灰所产生的膨胀现象。TFA在水泥基砂浆中具有显著活性,还能有利地替代水泥基材料中的部分水泥。从环境角度来看,对整体和破碎砂浆进行的传统浸出试验结果表明,某些有害元素(如锑和铬)的稳定化效果较差。使用富含磨细粒化高炉矿渣(GGBFS)的水泥来稳定铬的效果不佳。由于既没有足够的测试方法,也没有质量标准来评估废弃物的潜在污染物,以便对其进行再利用,因此很难就这种做法的环境安全性得出结论。有必要进行进一步的实验,以研究根据再利用方案引入水泥基砂浆中的TFA对环境的影响。