Lada Pamela, Delgado George
Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jan 1;64(1):63-8. doi: 10.2146/ajhp050213.
An analysis was conducted of pharmacist interventions and resuscitation experiences, including pharmacist participation in a hospital emergency department (ED), and the potential cost avoidance associated with the interventions made by the pharmacists.
All pharmacists working in the ED prospectively documented the pharmacist interventions that were accepted by physicians and nursing staff and entered into a spreadsheet on a weekly basis, between September 1, 2003, and December 31, 2003. Intervention categories included the provision of drug information; recommendations for dosage adjustment, formulary interchange, initiation of medications, alternative drug therapy, discontinuation of drug therapy, changes in medication therapy due to allergy notification, drug therapy duplication prevention, or changes in the route of drug administration; questions from nursing staff; order clarifications; drug compatibility issues; patient information; toxicology; and drug interaction identification. Intervention data were analyzed and the likelihood of harm was scored; interventions were classified and analyzed by calculating average cost, probability of harm, and potential cost avoidance.
During the study, 2150 pharmacist interventions were documented. Pharmacists participated in the care of 1042 patients triaged to the resuscitation area of the ED. Cost avoidance during the study was determined to be 1,029,776 dollars.
The most commonly documented interventions made by pharmacists involved in the care of patients visiting the ED included provision of drug information, dosage adjustment recommendations, responses to questions from nursing staff, formulary interchanges, and suggestions regarding initiation of drug therapy. The potential cost avoidance attributable to the pharmacist interventions during the study period was over 1 million dollars.
对药剂师的干预措施及复苏经验进行分析,包括药剂师在医院急诊科(ED)的参与情况,以及与药剂师所做干预措施相关的潜在成本节约。
2003年9月1日至2003年12月31日期间,所有在急诊科工作的药剂师前瞻性地记录被医生和护理人员接受的药剂师干预措施,并每周录入电子表格。干预类别包括提供药物信息;剂量调整建议、药品目录替换、药物起始治疗、替代药物治疗、停止药物治疗、因过敏通知导致的药物治疗改变、预防药物治疗重复或药物给药途径改变;护理人员的问题;医嘱澄清;药物相容性问题;患者信息;毒理学;以及药物相互作用识别。对干预数据进行分析并对伤害可能性进行评分;通过计算平均成本、伤害概率和潜在成本节约对干预措施进行分类和分析。
在研究期间,记录了2150次药剂师干预措施。药剂师参与了1042名被分诊到急诊科复苏区域患者的护理。研究期间确定的成本节约为1,029,776美元。
参与急诊科患者护理的药剂师记录的最常见干预措施包括提供药物信息、剂量调整建议、对护理人员问题的回应、药品目录替换以及关于药物起始治疗的建议。研究期间药剂师干预措施带来的潜在成本节约超过100万美元。