• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进展期胃癌扩大根治术(D2/D3)后切缘受累的预后影响:单中心15年经验

Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute.

作者信息

Cho Byoung Chul, Jeung Hei Cheul, Choi Hye Jin, Rha Sun Young, Hyung Woo Jin, Cheong Jae Ho, Noh Sung Hoon, Chung Hyun Cheol

机构信息

Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2007 May 1;95(6):461-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20731.

DOI:10.1002/jso.20731
PMID:17192913
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether microscopic positive margins are detrimental to the outcome of gastric cancer patients treated with extended (D2/3) gastrectomy.

METHODS

Among 2,740 consecutive patients who had undergone extended gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer between January 1987 and December 2002, 49 patients (1.8%) had positive resection margins on final histology.

RESULTS

Among 49 patients, 29 (59.2%) had proximal involved margins and 20 (40.8%) had distal involved margins. The median survival time of the positive margin group was 34 months. The negative margin group had a significantly longer median survival time of 69 months (P = 0.025). When both groups of patients were stratified according to nodal stage, a positive resection margin determined a worse prognosis only in patients with node-negative disease (174 months vs. 37 months, P = 0.0001). In patients with nodal metastasis, the median survival time was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a positive microscopic margin is associated with a worse outcome in patients with node-negative disease. Therefore, a more aggressive treatment, such as re-operation, is needed in node-negative patients with a positive microscopic disease.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在调查显微镜下切缘阳性是否对接受扩大(D2/3)胃切除术的胃癌患者的预后产生不利影响。

方法

在1987年1月至2002年12月期间连续接受扩大胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌的2740例患者中,49例(1.8%)最终组织学检查切缘阳性。

结果

49例患者中,29例(59.2%)近端切缘受累,20例(40.8%)远端切缘受累。切缘阳性组的中位生存时间为34个月。切缘阴性组的中位生存时间显著更长,为69个月(P = 0.025)。当两组患者根据淋巴结分期进行分层时,切缘阳性仅在淋巴结阴性疾病患者中决定了更差的预后(174个月对37个月,P = 0.0001)。在有淋巴结转移的患者中,两组的中位生存时间相似。

结论

我们的结果表明,显微镜下切缘阳性与淋巴结阴性疾病患者的较差预后相关。因此,对于显微镜下疾病阳性的淋巴结阴性患者,需要采取更积极的治疗措施,如再次手术。

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute.进展期胃癌扩大根治术(D2/D3)后切缘受累的预后影响:单中心15年经验
J Surg Oncol. 2007 May 1;95(6):461-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20731.
2
Changing patterns of prognosticators during 15-year follow-up of advanced gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy: a 15-year follow-up study at a single korean institute.根治性胃切除术后辅助化疗的晚期胃癌患者15年随访期间预后因素模式的变化:韩国一家机构的15年随访研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct;14(10):2730-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9479-4. Epub 2007 Jul 14.
3
The effect of extended lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.扩大淋巴结清扫术对胃腺癌患者生存率的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jul;181(1):56-64.
4
Does extended lymphadenectomy influence prognosis of gastric carcinoma after curative resection?扩大淋巴结清扫术对胃癌根治性切除术后的预后有影响吗?
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 Sep-Oct;47(35):1470-4.
5
Long-term survival and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic gastric cancers treated with chemotherapy in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) study.日本临床肿瘤学组(JCOG)研究中接受化疗的转移性胃癌患者的长期生存及预后因素
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov;34(11):654-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyh120.
6
Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin-C (FAM) for 6 months after curative resection of gastric carcinoma.胃癌根治性切除术后使用5-氟尿嘧啶、阿霉素和丝裂霉素-C(FAM)进行6个月的辅助化疗。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007 Sep;33(7):843-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.11.030. Epub 2007 Jan 5.
7
Does graded histologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict survival for completely resected gastric cancer?新辅助化疗后的组织学反应分级能否预测完全切除的胃癌患者的生存率?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;14(12):3412-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9574-6. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
8
Intraoperative radiotherapy combined with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.术中放疗联合辅助放化疗治疗局部晚期胃腺癌。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Dec 1;72(5):1488-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
9
P53 protein expression in gastric adenocarcinoma. Negative predictor of survival after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.P53蛋白在胃腺癌中的表达。术后辅助化疗后生存的阴性预测指标。
Anticancer Res. 2000 Sep-Oct;20(5C):3929-33.
10
Prognostic indicators in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) treated with preoperative chemotherapy and D2-gastrectomy.术前化疗联合D2胃切除术治疗局部进展期胃癌(LAGC)的预后指标
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Mar 15;89(4):227-36; discussion 237-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20207.

引用本文的文献

1
Maintenance of resection margins in gastrectomy for cancer: simple in procedure, influential in survival-current status and literature review on optimal lengths and positive margins.胃癌胃切除术中切缘的维持:手术操作简单,对生存有影响——最佳长度和切缘阳性的现状及文献综述
Surg Today. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03068-0.
2
Real-World Experience of Clinical Outcomes of Microscopic Margin Positivity After Radical Gastrectomy from a Tertiary Cancer Center in Northeast India.印度东北部一家三级癌症中心根治性胃切除术后显微镜下切缘阳性临床结局的真实世界经验
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;16(1):290-295. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02081-y. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
3
Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline).
《2024年韩国胃癌诊疗指南:基于证据的多学科方法(2022年指南更新)》
J Gastric Cancer. 2025 Jan;25(1):5-114. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e11.
4
Risk factors and prognostic analysis of microscopic positive esophageal margins after radical surgery for proximal gastric cancer.根治性手术后近端胃癌显微镜下食管切缘阳性的危险因素及预后分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03527-x.
5
Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for T4a gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of long-term outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹全胃切除术治疗 T4a 期胃癌:长期疗效的倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):1843-1854. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01910-7. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
6
Adequate gross resection margin length ensuring pathologically complete resection in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胃癌胃切除术中确保病理完全切除的足够切缘长度:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 Dec 5;8(2):202-213. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12761. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Safety and effectiveness of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy vs laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis.完全腹腔镜全胃切除术与腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1245-1265. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000921.
8
A shorter distal resection margin is a surrogate marker of nodal metastasis and poor prognosis in distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.远端切缘较短是晚期胃癌远端胃切除术后淋巴结转移和预后不良的替代标志物。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 7;23(1):1075. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11570-2.
9
The correlation between the margin of resection and prognosis in esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.食管胃结合部腺癌的切缘与预后的相关性。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct 9;21(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03202-7.
10
Oncological Impact of Gross Proximal Margin Length in Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Is the Japanese Recommendation Valid?近端切缘长度对胃癌远端胃切除术的肿瘤学影响:日本的建议是否有效?
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Feb 8;2(1):e036. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000036. eCollection 2021 Mar.