Li Jun, Smart Roger St C, Schumann Russell C, Gerson Andrea R, Levay George
Applied Centre for Structural and Synchrotron Studies, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2007 Feb 1;373(1):391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.11.012. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
In acid base accounting (ABA) estimates of acid mine wastes, the acid potential (AP) estimate can be improved by using the net carbonate value (NCV) reactive sulfide S method rather than total S assay methods but this does not give recovery of potentially acid producing ferrous and ferric sulfates present in many wastes. For more accurate estimation of AP, an effective, site-specific method to quantify acid sulfate salts, such as jarosite and melanterite, in waste rocks has been developed and tested on synthetic and real wastes. The SPOCAS (acid sulfate soils) methods have been modified to an effective, rapid method to speciate sulfate forms in different synthetic waste samples. A three-step sequential extraction procedure has been established. These steps are: (1) argon-purged water extraction (3 min) to extract soluble Fe(II) salts (particularly melanterite), epsomite and gypsum (<10 wt.%), (2) roasting at 550 degrees C (1 h) to remove sulfur from pyrite and other reactive sulfides, (3) HCl extraction (4 M, 30 min) for determination of jarosites. Products (solid and aqueous) have been characterized at each step including the jarosite decomposition process in Step 2 where temperature control is critical to avoid S loss. The sequential extraction procedure was used to quantitatively determine melanterite, epsomite, gypsum, pyrite and jarosite concentrations in a synthetic waste sample containing these mineral phases at 5 wt.% in quartz, and also tested using a tailings waste sample to quantitatively determine epsomite, gypsum and jarosite contents. The method is applicable to most waste samples including those with non-pyrite sulfides but for samples containing significant amounts of sulfur (>1 wt.% S) as copper sulfides, the second step of roasting needs to be excluded from the procedure with an increased time of 4 M HCl extraction to 16 h for jarosite determination.
在酸性矿山废弃物的酸碱核算(ABA)评估中,通过使用净碳酸盐值(NCV)活性硫化物S法而非总S测定法,可以改进酸潜力(AP)的估算,但这无法回收许多废弃物中存在的潜在产酸硫酸亚铁和硫酸铁。为了更准确地估算AP,已开发出一种有效的、针对特定场地的方法,用于量化废石中诸如黄钾铁矾和水绿矾等酸性硫酸盐的含量,并在合成和实际废弃物上进行了测试。已将SPOCAS(酸性硫酸盐土壤)方法修改为一种有效的、快速的方法,用于区分不同合成废弃物样品中的硫酸盐形态。已建立了三步顺序提取程序。这些步骤是:(1)用氩气吹扫的水提取(3分钟),以提取可溶性Fe(II)盐(特别是水绿矾)、泻利盐和石膏(<10重量%);(2)在550℃下焙烧(1小时),以从黄铁矿和其他活性硫化物中去除硫;(3)用HCl提取(4M,30分钟)以测定黄钾铁矾。已对每个步骤的产物(固体和水溶液)进行了表征,包括第2步中的黄钾铁矾分解过程,其中温度控制对于避免S损失至关重要。顺序提取程序用于定量测定含有这些矿物相且在石英中含量为5重量%的合成废弃物样品中的水绿矾、泻利盐、石膏、黄铁矿和黄钾铁矾浓度,还使用尾矿废弃物样品进行了测试,以定量测定泻利盐、石膏和黄钾铁矾含量。该方法适用于大多数废弃物样品,包括那些含有非黄铁矿硫化物的样品,但对于含有大量硫(>1重量% S)的硫化铜样品,该程序需要排除第二步焙烧,将4M HCl提取时间增加到16小时以测定黄钾铁矾。