Suppr超能文献

认知行为疗法与帕罗西汀治疗疑病症:一项随机对照试验

Cognitive behavior therapy and paroxetine in the treatment of hypochondriasis: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Greeven Anja, van Balkom Anton J L M, Visser Sako, Merkelbach Jille W, van Rood Yanda R, van Dyck Richard, Van der Does A J Willem, Zitman Frans G, Spinhoven Philip

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;164(1):91-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.1.91.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study, to the authors' knowledge, is the first randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), paroxetine, and a placebo (administered in a double blind fashion) in the treatment of hypochondriasis.

METHOD

The authors randomly assigned 112 subjects with hypochondriasis according to DSM-IV criteria to 16 weeks of outpatient treatment with CBT, paroxetine, or a placebo. The main outcome measure was the Whiteley Index. The authors made pretest and posttest assessments and analyzed all outcome measures using a General Linear Model 3x2 repeated measures analysis of variance with Helmert contrasts. The authors considered subjects who scored at least one standard deviation below the mean pretest score on the Whiteley Index as responders. All analyses were conducted on intent-to-treat and completer bases.

RESULTS

On the Whiteley Index, Helmert contrasts on the intent-to-treat and completer cohorts revealed that pooled CBT and paroxetine were significantly superior to placebo, but did not differ significantly from each other. The responder analysis on the intent-to-treat cohort and completer cohort, respectively, revealed the following percentages of responders per group: CBT group, 45% and 54%; paroxetine group, 30% and 38%; and placebo group, 14% and 12%. In the intent-to-treat analysis, only CBT differed significantly from the placebo. In the completer analysis, both paroxetine and CBT differed significantly from the placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

CBT or paroxetine are effective short-term treatment options for subjects with hypochondriasis.

摘要

目的

据作者所知,本研究是第一项比较认知行为疗法(CBT)、帕罗西汀和安慰剂(采用双盲方式给药)治疗疑病症疗效的随机对照试验。

方法

作者根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)标准,将112名疑病症患者随机分配接受为期16周的门诊CBT治疗、帕罗西汀治疗或安慰剂治疗。主要结局指标是惠特利指数。作者进行了前测和后测评估,并使用广义线性模型3x2重复测量方差分析及赫尔默特对比分析所有结局指标。作者将在惠特利指数上得分至少比前测平均分低一个标准差的受试者视为有反应者。所有分析均基于意向性分析和完成治疗分析。

结果

在惠特利指数上,意向性分析队列和完成治疗队列的赫尔默特对比显示,CBT和帕罗西汀联合使用显著优于安慰剂,但彼此之间无显著差异。意向性分析队列和完成治疗队列的有反应者分析分别显示每组有反应者的百分比如下:CBT组,45%和54%;帕罗西汀组,30%和38%;安慰剂组,14%和12%。在意向性分析中,只有CBT与安慰剂有显著差异。在完成治疗分析中,帕罗西汀和CBT均与安慰剂有显著差异。

结论

CBT或帕罗西汀是疑病症患者有效的短期治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验