Haynes David S, O'Malley Matthew, Cohen Seth, Watford Kenneth, Labadie Robert F
Vanderbilt University Medical Center/The Otology Group of Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2007 Jan;117(1):3-15. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000245058.11866.15.
Intratympanic steroids are increasingly used in the treatment of inner ear disorders, especially in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who have failed systemic therapy. We reviewed our experience with intratympanic steroids in the treatment of patients with sudden SNHL to determine overall success, morbidity, and prognostic factors.
Intratympanic steroids have minimal morbidity and the potential to have a positive effect on hearing recovery in patients with sudden SNHL who have failed systemic therapy.
The authors conducted a retrospective review.
Patients presenting with sudden SNHL defined as a rapid decline in hearing over 3 days or less affecting 3 or more frequencies by 30 dB or greater who underwent intratympanic steroids therapy (24 mg/mL dexamethasone) were reviewed. Excluded were patients with Meniere disease, retrocochlear disease, autoimmune HL, trauma, fluctuating HL, radiation-induced HL, noise-induced HL, or any other identifiable etiology for sudden HL. Patients who showed signs of fluctuation of hearing after injection were excluded. Pretreatment and posttreatment audiometric evaluations including pure-tone average (PTA) and speech reception threshold (SRT) were analyzed. Patient variables as they related to recovery were studied and included patient age, time to onset of therapy, status of the contralateral ear, presence of diabetes, severity of HL, and presence of associated symptoms (tinnitus, vertigo). A 20-dB gain in PTA or a 20% improvement in SDS was considered significant.
: Forty patients fit the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 years with a range from 17 to 84 years of age. Overall, 40% (n = 16) showed any improvement in PTA or SDS. Fourteen (35%) men and 26 (65%) women were included. Using the criteria of 20-dB improvement in PTA or 20% improvement in SDS for success, 27.5% (n = 11) showed improvement. The mean number of days from onset of symptoms to intratympanic therapy was 40 days with a range of 7 days to 310 days. A statistically significant difference was noted in those patients who received earlier injection (P = .0008, rank sum test). No patient receiving intratympanic dexamethasone after 36 days recovered hearing using 20-dB PTA decrease or a 20% increase in discrimination as criteria for recovery. Twelve percent (n = 5) of patients in the study had diabetes with 20% recovering after intratympanic dexamethasone (not significantly different from nondiabetics at 28.6%, Fisher exact test, P = 1.0). Comparison to other studies that used differing steroid type, concentration, dosing schedule, inclusion criteria, and criteria for success revealed, in many instances, a similar overall recovery rate.
Difficulty in proving efficacy of a single modality is present in all studies on SNHL secondary to multiple treatment protocols, variable rates of recovery, and a high rate of spontaneous recovery. Forty percent of patients showed some improvement in SDS or PTA after treatment failure. When criteria of 20-dB PTA or 20% is considered to define improvement, the recovery rate was 27.5%. Modest improvement is seen with the current protocol of a single intratympanic steroid injection of 24 mg/mL dexamethasone in patients who failed systemic therapy. Dramatic hearing recovery in treatment failures was rarely encountered. No patient showed significant benefit from intratympanic steroids after 36 days when using this protocol for idiopathic sudden SNHL. If patients injected after 6 weeks are excluded from the study, the improvement rate increases from 26.9% to 39.3%. Earlier intratympanic injection had a significant impact on hearing recovery, although with any therapeutic intervention for sudden SNHL, early success may be attributed to natural history. If we further exclude seven patients treated with intratympanic steroids within 2 weeks of the onset of symptoms (i.e., study only those patients treated with intratympanic dexamethasone between 2 and 6 weeks after onset of symptoms), still, 26% improved by 20 dB or 20% SDS. The recovery rates after initial systemic failure are higher than would be expected in this treatment failure group given our control group (9.1%) and literature review. These findings indicate a positive effect from steroid perfusion in this patient population.
鼓室内注射类固醇越来越多地用于治疗内耳疾病,尤其是在全身治疗失败的突发性感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)患者中。我们回顾了我们使用鼓室内注射类固醇治疗突发性SNHL患者的经验,以确定总体成功率、发病率和预后因素。
对于全身治疗失败的突发性SNHL患者,鼓室内注射类固醇的发病率极低,且有可能对听力恢复产生积极影响。
作者进行了一项回顾性研究。
对那些突发性SNHL定义为在3天或更短时间内听力迅速下降,影响3个或更多频率达30dB或更高且接受鼓室内类固醇治疗(24mg/mL地塞米松)的患者进行了回顾。排除患有梅尼埃病、蜗后疾病、自身免疫性HL、创伤、波动性HL、辐射性HL、噪声性HL或任何其他可识别的突发性HL病因的患者。排除注射后出现听力波动迹象的患者。分析了治疗前和治疗后的听力测试评估,包括纯音平均听阈(PTA)和言语接受阈(SRT)。研究了与恢复相关的患者变量,包括患者年龄、治疗开始时间、对侧耳状况、糖尿病的存在、HL严重程度以及相关症状(耳鸣、眩晕)的存在。PTA提高20dB或言语辨别得分(SDS)提高20%被认为具有显著意义。
40名患者符合纳入研究的标准。患者的平均年龄为54.8岁,年龄范围为17至八4岁。总体而言,40%(n=16)的患者PTA或SDS有任何改善。其中包括14名(35%)男性和26名(65%)女性。以PTA提高20dB或SDS提高20%作为成功标准,27.5%(n=11)的患者有改善。从症状出现到鼓室内治疗的平均天数为40天,范围为7天至310天。在那些接受更早注射的患者中观察到有统计学意义的差异(P=.0008,秩和检验)。以PTA降低20dB或辨别力提高20%作为恢复标准,36天后接受鼓室内地塞米松治疗的患者中没有患者恢复听力。研究中的患者有12%(n=5)患有糖尿病,其中20%在鼓室内注射地塞米松后恢复(与非糖尿病患者的28.6%无显著差异,Fisher精确检验,P=I.0)。与其他使用不同类固醇类型、浓度、给药方案、纳入标准和成功标准的研究相比,在许多情况下,总体恢复率相似。
由于多种治疗方案、不同的恢复率和较高的自发恢复率,在所有关于SNHL的研究中都难以证明单一治疗方式的疗效。40%的患者在治疗失败后SDS或PTA有一定改善。当以PTA提高20dB或20%作为改善标准时,恢复率为27.5%。对于全身治疗失败的患者,目前单次鼓室内注射24mg/mL地塞米松的方案有一定程度的改善。很少遇到治疗失败后听力显著恢复的情况。对于特发性突发性SNHL,使用该方案时,36天后没有患者从鼓室内注射类固醇中获得显著益处。如果将6周后注射的患者排除在研究之外,改善率从26.9%提高到39.3%。更早的鼓室内注射对听力恢复有显著影响,尽管对于突发性SNHL的任何治疗干预,早期成功可能归因于自然病程。如果我们进一步排除症状出现后2周内接受鼓室内类固醇治疗的7名患者(即仅研究症状出现后2至6周接受鼓室内地塞米松治疗的患者),仍有26%的患者PTA提高20dB或SDS提高20%。鉴于我们的对照组(9.1%)和文献综述,初始全身治疗失败后的恢复率高于该治疗失败组的预期。这些发现表明类固醇灌注对该患者群体有积极影响。