Reicher-Reiss H, Barasch E
Heart Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Drugs. 1991 Sep;42(3):343-64. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199142030-00002.
The presence of calcium ions is essential to the normal function of the cardiovascular system. Drugs such as calcium antagonists can modulate the interaction between these ions and specific cells at different levels, interfering with myocardial contraction and relaxation, vascular tone, specific conduction tissues and neuromuscular function. Vascular beds play a crucial role in adjustment of myocardial function to different body oxygen requirements; compensatory mechanisms in congestive heart failure (CHF) involve the vascular system to a large extent and paradoxically may worsen myocardial performance. Vasodilating drugs represent an important step forward in achieving better symptomatic results in CHF patients, and may also increase their survival. Of the different classes of vasodilator drugs calcium antagonists may represent an attractive alternative due to their anti-ischaemic and antiarrhythmic effects. Despite the overall good response to the acute use of these drugs in CHF, long term studies in which first generation calcium antagonists (nifedipine, diltiazem, verapamil) were used have produced disappointing results. Their main drawbacks were negative inotropism, lack of preload reduction and activation of neurohormonal mechanisms with a subsequent adverse effect on cardiovascular function, the latter effect being the most significant. A few long term studies, of between 1 and 52 months, have not demonstrated a consistent improvement in functional class in spite of apparently good initial results. The second generation of calcium antagonists have more potent and selective vasodilating properties with less negative inotropic effects; these properties might justify their use in the therapy of CHF, but no clear recommendations can be given due to the lack of large, long-term, controlled studies. Overall, the existing clinical trials with calcium antagonists in CHF have not proved the superiority of this group of drugs when compared to other vasodilators. If the aetiology of CHF is related to the presence of coronary artery disease or arterial hypertension, calcium antagonists might be considered as additional therapeutic options. Diastolic dysfunction may be corrected or improved and coronary tone may be diminished, both of which may lead to a better myocardial oxygen supply. Systolic myocardial function must be evaluated in CHF patients before starting therapy with calcium antagonists in order to avoid possible deleterious effects. Further studies may shed more light on this matter and may indicate decisively whether or not calcium antagonists should play a role in the therapeutic pharmacological arsenal of selected CHF patients.
钙离子的存在对于心血管系统的正常功能至关重要。钙拮抗剂等药物可在不同水平调节这些离子与特定细胞之间的相互作用,干扰心肌收缩与舒张、血管张力、特定传导组织及神经肌肉功能。血管床在使心肌功能适应身体不同氧需求的调节中起关键作用;充血性心力衰竭(CHF)中的代偿机制在很大程度上涉及血管系统,且反常的是可能会使心肌性能恶化。血管扩张药物是在CHF患者中取得更好症状改善方面向前迈出的重要一步,还可能提高患者生存率。在不同类别的血管扩张药物中,钙拮抗剂因其抗缺血和抗心律失常作用可能是一种有吸引力的选择。尽管这些药物在CHF急性使用时总体反应良好,但使用第一代钙拮抗剂(硝苯地平、地尔硫䓬、维拉帕米)的长期研究结果令人失望。其主要缺点是负性肌力作用、缺乏前负荷降低以及神经激素机制的激活,随后对心血管功能产生不利影响,后一种影响最为显著。一些为期1至52个月的长期研究,尽管初始结果看似良好,但并未证明功能分级有持续改善。第二代钙拮抗剂具有更强效和更具选择性的血管扩张特性,负性肌力作用较小;这些特性可能使其适用于CHF治疗,但由于缺乏大规模、长期、对照研究,无法给出明确建议。总体而言,现有的CHF钙拮抗剂临床试验未证明该类药物相较于其他血管扩张剂具有优越性。如果CHF的病因与冠状动脉疾病或动脉高血压的存在有关,钙拮抗剂可被视为额外的治疗选择。舒张功能障碍可能得到纠正或改善,冠状动脉张力可能降低,这两者都可能导致更好的心肌氧供应。在CHF患者开始使用钙拮抗剂治疗前,必须评估收缩期心肌功能,以避免可能的有害影响。进一步的研究可能会更清楚地阐明此事,并可能决定性地表明钙拮抗剂是否应在选定的CHF患者治疗药物库中发挥作用。