Esteve J, Escoda L, Martín G, Rubio V, Díaz-Mediavilla J, González M, Rivas C, Alvarez C, González San Miguel J D, Brunet S, Tomás J F, Tormo M, Sayas M J, Sánchez Godoy P, Colomer D, Bolufer P, Sanz M A
Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Leukemia. 2007 Mar;21(3):446-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404501. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
To determine prognosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) failing to front-line therapy with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracyclines, outcome of 52 patients (32 M/20 F; age: 37, 3-72) included in PETHEMA trials LPA96 and LPA99 who presented with either molecular failure (MOLrel, n=16) or hematological relapse (HEMrel, n=36) was analyzed. Salvage therapy consisted of ATRA and high-dose ara-C-based chemotherapy (HDAC) in most cases (83%), followed by stem-cell transplantation (autologous, 18; allogeneic, 10; syngeneic, 1). Fourteen patients with MOLrel (88%) achieved second molecular complete response (molCR), whereas 81% HEMrel patients responded to second-line treatment, with 58% molCR. After median follow-up of 45 months, four MOLrel and 18 HEMrel patients, respectively, experienced a second relapse. Outcome after MOLrel compared favorably to HEMrel, with longer survival (5-year survival: 64+/-14 vs 24+/-8%, P=0.01) and lower relapse risk (5-year relapse risk: 30+/-13 vs 64+/-9%; P=0.044). Additionally, age <or=40 and male gender were favorable variables for survival, whereas molecular response predicted longer leukemia-free survival. In conclusion, early institution of salvage therapy at molecular failure, before onset of hematological relapse, is beneficial in APL. Moreover, given the poor outcome of HEMrel managed with ATRA and HDAC, use of alternative therapeutic strategies in this setting is warranted.
为确定一线接受全反式维甲酸(ATRA)和蒽环类药物治疗失败的急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)患者的预后,对纳入PETHEMA试验LPA96和LPA99的52例患者(32例男性/20例女性;年龄:37岁,3 - 72岁)的结局进行了分析,这些患者出现分子学缓解失败(MOLrel,n = 16)或血液学复发(HEMrel,n = 36)。挽救性治疗在大多数情况下(83%)包括ATRA和基于大剂量阿糖胞苷的化疗(HDAC),随后进行干细胞移植(自体移植18例;异基因移植10例;同基因移植1例)。14例MOLrel患者(88%)获得第二次分子学完全缓解(molCR),而81%的HEMrel患者对二线治疗有反应,其中58%达到molCR。中位随访45个月后分别有4例MOLrel患者和18例HEMrel患者出现第二次复发。MOLrel后的结局优于HEMrel,生存期更长(5年生存率:64±14%对24±8%,P = 0.01)且复发风险更低(5年复发风险:30±13%对64±9%;P = 0.044)。此外,年龄≤40岁和男性是生存的有利因素,而分子学反应预示着更长的无白血病生存期。总之,在血液学复发发生前分子学缓解失败时尽早进行挽救性治疗对APL患者有益。此外,鉴于采用ATRA和HDAC治疗HEMrel的结局较差,在这种情况下有必要采用替代治疗策略。