Suppr超能文献

立体运动速度处理的空间尺度。

Spatial scale of stereomotion speed processing.

作者信息

Brooks Kevin R, Stone Leland S

机构信息

NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2006 Oct 26;6(11):1257-66. doi: 10.1167/6.11.9.

Abstract

To examine the spatial scale of the mechanisms supporting the perception of motion in depth defined by binocular cues, we measured stereomotion speed discrimination thresholds as a function of stimulus size using a two-interval speed comparison task. Stimuli were either random dot stereogram (RDS) bars featuring both the changing disparity (CD) and the interocular velocity difference (IOVD) cues to motion in depth or dynamic random dot stereogram (DRDS) bars featuring the CD cue alone. Monocular speed discrimination performance was also assessed, using half-images of the RDS stimulus. In addition, subjects' stereoacuity for stationary versions of the binocular stimuli was measured. Stimuli ranged in vertical extent from 1.25 to 40 min. Sensitivity to speed differences was strongly related to stimulus height for DRDS stimuli. Performance decreased rapidly as stimulus size was reduced, becoming nearly random for heights below 5 min. However, for RDS stimuli, speed discrimination performance declined with reductions in stimulus size at a far slower rate, providing superior performance at every stimulus size used. Monocular performance was superior still for the majority of subjects, yet showed a similar rate of decline to binocular RDS stimuli. We conclude that the spatial resolution of the CD mechanism and its static disparity inputs is, on average, nearly nine times more coarse than the IOVD system and its monocular motion inputs. Static stereoacuity controls show that this finding cannot be explained by differences in the disparity signals available in our RDS and DRDS stimuli.

摘要

为了研究支持由双眼线索定义的深度运动感知机制的空间尺度,我们使用双间隔速度比较任务,测量了立体运动速度辨别阈值作为刺激大小的函数。刺激物要么是具有视差变化(CD)和眼间速度差异(IOVD)线索以产生深度运动的随机点立体图(RDS)条,要么是仅具有CD线索的动态随机点立体图(DRDS)条。还使用RDS刺激的半图像评估了单眼速度辨别性能。此外,测量了受试者对双眼刺激静止版本的立体视敏度。刺激的垂直范围从1.25到40分钟。对于DRDS刺激,对速度差异的敏感度与刺激高度密切相关。随着刺激大小的减小,性能迅速下降,对于高度低于5分钟的情况,性能几乎变得随机。然而,对于RDS刺激,速度辨别性能随刺激大小的减小而下降的速度要慢得多,在使用的每个刺激大小下都提供了更好的性能。对于大多数受试者来说,单眼性能仍然更好,但下降速率与双眼RDS刺激相似。我们得出结论,平均而言,CD机制及其静态视差输入的空间分辨率比IOVD系统及其单眼运动输入的空间分辨率粗糙近九倍。静态立体视敏度对照表明,这一发现不能用我们的RDS和DRDS刺激中可用的视差信号差异来解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验