Kaplan Kevin M, Gruson Konrad I, Gorczynksi Chris T, Strauss Eric J, Kummer Fred J, Rokito Andrew S
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2007 Jan;23(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.10.012.
Surgeons have noticed an increased incidence of finger lacerations associated with arthroscopic knot tying with solid-core suture material. This study examines glove perforations and finger lacerations during arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
We collected 400 surgical gloves from 50 consecutive arthroscopic shoulder repair procedures using No. 2 solid-core sutures. Two surgeons using double gloves were involved in every case, with one being responsible for tying all knots. Powder-free latex gloves were worn in all cases. Knots consisted of a sliding stitch of the surgeon's preference followed by 3 half-hitches via a knot-pusher instrument. All gloves were inspected grossly and then tested for tears with an electroconductivity meter.
The knot-tying surgeon had significantly more glove tears than the control (P < .01). Tears were localized to the radial side of the index finger of the glove at the distal interphalangeal joint in all cases. Of the tying surgeon's gloves, 68 (34%) were found to have tears. These included 17 inner gloves (17%) and 51 outer gloves (51%). If an inner glove was torn, the corresponding outer glove was torn in all cases. A mean of 3.96 knots were tied in each case. There was a significantly higher incidence of inner glove tears when more than 3 knots were tied (P < .03). There was no significant difference in glove tears between suture types. Finger lacerations did occur in the absence of glove tears. However, in the presence of an inner glove tear, there was a statistically significant association with a finger laceration at the corresponding level (P < .03).
Intraoperative glove tears and subsequent finger lacerations occur with a high frequency when arthroscopic knots are tied with solid-core suture material. Risk can potentially be minimized by frequent glove changes or use of more durable, less penetrable gloves.
This study addresses surgeon and patient safety during arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
外科医生注意到,使用实心缝线材料进行关节镜打结时,手指撕裂伤的发生率有所增加。本研究旨在调查关节镜下肩部手术期间手套穿孔和手指撕裂伤情况。
我们从连续50例使用2号实心缝线的关节镜下肩部修复手术中收集了400副手术手套。每例手术由两名使用双层手套的外科医生参与,其中一名负责所有打结操作。所有病例均佩戴无粉乳胶手套。打结方式为外科医生偏好的滑结,随后通过打结器打3个半结。所有手套先进行肉眼检查,然后用电导率仪检测是否有撕裂。
打结的外科医生手套撕裂明显多于对照组(P <.01)。所有病例中,撕裂均位于手套食指桡侧远侧指间关节处。在打结外科医生的手套中,发现68副(34%)有撕裂。其中包括17副内层手套(17%)和51副外层手套(51%)。如果内层手套撕裂,相应的外层手套在所有情况下都会撕裂。每例平均打结3.96个。打结超过3个时,内层手套撕裂的发生率显著更高(P <.03)。不同缝线类型的手套撕裂情况无显著差异。在没有手套撕裂的情况下也确实发生了手指撕裂伤。然而,当内层手套撕裂时,相应部位手指撕裂伤的发生率在统计学上有显著相关性(P <.03)。
使用实心缝线材料进行关节镜打结时,术中手套撕裂及随后的手指撕裂伤发生率很高。通过频繁更换手套或使用更耐用、更不易穿透的手套,可将风险降至最低。
本研究关注关节镜下肩部手术期间外科医生和患者的安全。