Weindling Paul
Department of History, Oxford Brookes University.
Sci Context. 2006 Sep;19(3):401-18. doi: 10.1017/s0269889706000998.
The liberation of the concentration camp at Bergen-Belsen has remained controversial with opinion divided over whether the British military and subsequently the British zonal administration responded adequately to the plight of survivors. This paper reconsiders the evidence on health conditions at Bergen-Belsen. At first the British underestimated the incidence of typhus and the delay in taking effective measures caused the death rate to remain high. In the longer-term, measures for psychotic, old, and infirm DPs were inadequate as criteria that favored the fit and able-bodied were applied when selecting migrants.
贝尔根-贝尔森集中营的解放一直存在争议,对于英国军队以及随后的英国占领区行政当局是否充分应对了幸存者的困境,各方观点不一。本文重新审视了有关贝尔根-贝尔森健康状况的证据。起初,英国人低估了斑疹伤寒的发病率,而采取有效措施的延迟导致死亡率居高不下。从长远来看,针对患有精神疾病、年老体弱的流离失所者的措施并不充分,因为在挑选移民时采用了有利于身体健康者的标准。