Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房以外的医院获得性胃肠道出血:危险因素、抑酸作用及内镜检查结果

Hospital-acquired gastrointestinal bleeding outside the critical care unit: risk factors, role of acid suppression, and endoscopy findings.

作者信息

Qadeer Mohammed A, Richter Joel E, Brotman Daniel J

机构信息

Department of General Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2006 Jan;1(1):13-20. doi: 10.1002/jhm.10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for hospital-acquired gastrointestinal bleeding in the intensive care unit are established, and acid-suppressive prophylaxis has been advocated for certain subsets of critically ill patients. In contrast, risk factors and appropriate prevention strategies are not yet established for general medical patients. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for nosocomial gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in non-critically ill medical patients, to evaluate the utility of prophylactic gastric acid suppression, and to characterize the endoscopic lesions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study that took place at a U.S. tertiary care center. All patients admitted to the General Medicine ward for nongastrointestinal disorders who developed clinically relevant gastrointestinal bleeding during admission or within 4 weeks of discharge were considered cases. Clinically relevant bleeding was defined as any bleeding requiring esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Random controls were matched to cases by date of hospitalization in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical information was extracted by chart review.

RESULTS

Of 17,707 patients admitted to the General Medicine ward over a 4-year period, 73 (0.41%) met the case definition. The main risk factor for nosocomial GIB was treatment with full dose anticoagulants or clopidogrel (OR = 5.4; 2.6-11.7; P < .0001). Use of aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and glucocorticoids did not differ significantly between cases and controls. De novo acid-suppressive prophylaxis was not protective (OR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.4-2.4; P = 0.97). Endoscopic abnormalities were noted in 74% of patients; many cases had lesions unlikely to be prevented by acid blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital-acquired gastrointestinal bleeding is uncommon in non-critically ill patients. Anticoagulation appears to be the most important risk factor for nosocomial GIB. Routine use of acid suppressant medications for prophylaxis is unnecessary in most hospitalized patients.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房医院获得性胃肠道出血的危险因素已明确,并且已提倡对某些重症患者亚组进行抑酸预防。相比之下,普通内科患者的危险因素和适当的预防策略尚未确立。本研究的目的是确定非重症内科患者医院获得性胃肠道出血(GIB)的危险因素,评估预防性抑酸的效用,并描述内镜下病变特征。

方法

这是一项在美国三级医疗中心进行的回顾性病例对照研究。所有因非胃肠道疾病入住普通内科病房且在住院期间或出院后4周内发生临床相关胃肠道出血的患者被视为病例。临床相关出血定义为任何需要进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)的出血。随机对照按住院日期以1:1的比例与病例匹配。通过病历审查提取临床信息。

结果

在4年期间入住普通内科病房的17707例患者中,73例(0.41%)符合病例定义。医院获得性GIB的主要危险因素是使用全剂量抗凝剂或氯吡格雷(OR = 5.4;2.6 - 11.7;P <.0001)。病例组和对照组在阿司匹林、非甾体类抗炎药和糖皮质激素的使用方面无显著差异。起始预防性抑酸无保护作用(OR = 1.0;95% CI:0.4 - 2.4;P = 0.97)。74%的患者存在内镜异常;许多病例的病变不太可能通过酸阻滞剂预防。

结论

医院获得性胃肠道出血在非重症患者中并不常见。抗凝似乎是医院获得性GIB最重要的危险因素。大多数住院患者无需常规使用抑酸药物进行预防。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验