Schneider Günther, Altmeyer Katrin, Kirchin Miles A, Seidel Roland, Grazioli Luigi, Morana Giovanni, Saini Sanjay
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Invest Radiol. 2007 Feb;42(2):105-15. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000251539.05400.06.
We sought to evaluate gadobenate dimeglumine for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions in the unenhanced and already pre-enhanced liver.
Sixty patients were evaluated prospectively. Unenhanced T1-weighted gradient echo (T1wGRE) and T2-weighted turbo spin echo (T2wTSE) images were acquired followed by contrast-enhanced T1wGRE images during the dynamic, equilibrium, and delayed phases after the bolus injection of 0.05 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine. An identical series of dynamic images was then acquired after the delayed scan following a second 0.05 mmol/kg bolus of gadobenate dimeglumine. Images were evaluated randomly in 2 sessions by 3 independent blinded readers. Evaluated images in the first session comprised the unenhanced images, the first or second set of dynamic images, and the delayed images. The second session included the unenhanced images, the dynamic images not yet evaluated in the first session, and the delayed images. The 2 reading sessions were compared for lesion characterization and diagnosis, and kappa (kappa) values for interobserver agreement were determined. Quantitative evaluation of lesion contrast enhancement was also performed.
The enhancement behavior in the second dynamic series was similar to that in the first series, although pre-enhancement of the normal liver resulted in reduced lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratios and the visualization of some lesions only on arterial phase images. Typical imaging features for the lesions included in the study were visualized clearly in both series. Strong agreement (kappa=0.56-0.89; all evaluations) between the 2 images sets was noted by all readers for differentiation of benign from malignant lesions and for definition of specific diagnosis, and between readers for diagnoses established based on images acquired in the unenhanced and pre-enhanced liver.
Dynamic imaging in the hepatobiliary phase gives similar information as dynamic imaging of the unenhanced liver. This might prove advantageous for screening protocols involving same session imaging of primary extrahepatic tumors and liver.
我们旨在评估钆贝葡胺用于检测和鉴别未增强及已预增强肝脏中的局灶性肝病变。
对60例患者进行前瞻性评估。先采集未增强的T1加权梯度回波(T1wGRE)和T2加权快速自旋回波(T2wTSE)图像,然后在静脉推注0.05 mmol/kg钆贝葡胺后的动态期、平衡期和延迟期采集对比增强T1wGRE图像。在第二次静脉推注0.05 mmol/kg钆贝葡胺后的延迟扫描后,再采集一系列相同的动态图像。由3名独立的盲法阅片者在2个阶段对图像进行随机评估。第一阶段评估的图像包括未增强图像、第一组或第二组动态图像以及延迟图像。第二阶段包括未增强图像、第一阶段未评估的动态图像以及延迟图像。比较两个阅片阶段对病变的特征描述和诊断情况,并确定观察者间一致性的kappa值。还对病变对比增强进行了定量评估。
尽管正常肝脏的预增强导致病变与肝脏的对比噪声比降低,且一些病变仅在动脉期图像上可见,但第二个动态系列的增强表现与第一个系列相似。研究中纳入的病变的典型影像学特征在两个系列中均清晰可见。所有阅片者均指出,两组图像在鉴别良性与恶性病变以及明确具体诊断方面具有高度一致性(kappa = 0.56 - 0.89;所有评估),并且在基于未增强和预增强肝脏采集的图像所做出的诊断方面,阅片者之间也具有高度一致性。
肝胆期的动态成像与未增强肝脏的动态成像提供相似的信息。这可能对涉及同一阶段对原发性肝外肿瘤和肝脏进行成像的筛查方案具有优势。