Nobili F, Koulibaly P M, Rodriguez G, Benoit M, Girtler N, Robert P H, Brugnolo A, Darcourt J
Clinical Neurophysiology, S.Martino General Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Dec;51(4):357-63.
Technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime ((99m)Tc-HMPAO) and technetium-99m N,N-1,2-ethylene diylbis-Lcysteine diethyl ester dihydrochloride ((99m)Tc-ECD) SPECT are widely used in Dementia Clinics for early and differential diagnosis. They have been shown to perform differently in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the impact of such differences on both research and clinical work is unknown. We investigated the differences between the 2 compounds in research work by assessing correlation between performance on a verbal memory task and cerebral perfusion in 2 matched groups of AD patients.
Nineteen pairs of patients with mild to moderate AD undergoing SPECT with either 99mTc-HMPAO or (99m)Tc-ECD were retrospectively selected in a Memory Clinic. Patients were matched for sex, age (+/-3 years) and the Mini-Mental State Examination score (+/-2 points) with a case-control procedure, thus obtaining 2 well-matched groups. The score on the Grober-Buschke selective reminding test (SRT) was correlated with SPECT in each group by means of statistical parametric mapping 99 (height threshold: P<0.01).
(99m)Tc-HMPAO SPECT yielded 3 significant correlation clusters involving inferior and middle frontal gyri, para-hippocampal gyrus and putamen in the right hemisphere; the middle and superior temporal gyri, insula and claustrum in the left hemisphere. (99m)Tc-ECD gave a significant cluster of correlation in left postcentral gyrus and inferior parietal lobule.
(99m)Tc-HMPAO SPECT correlation sites seem more consistent than (99m)Tc-ECD ones with the neurophysiological models of verbal memory, as designed both in normal individuals and in pathological conditions. The demonstration of such relevant differences introduces a source of variability among studies performed with either of the 2 compounds, which must be considered when interpreting results.
锝-99m六甲基丙烯胺肟((99m)Tc-HMPAO)和锝-99m N,N-1,2-乙二基双-L-半胱氨酸二乙酯二盐酸盐((99m)Tc-ECD)单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)在痴呆症诊所中广泛用于早期诊断和鉴别诊断。它们在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中的表现已显示出差异,但这种差异对研究和临床工作的影响尚不清楚。我们通过评估两组匹配的AD患者在言语记忆任务中的表现与脑灌注之间的相关性,研究了这两种化合物在研究工作中的差异。
在一家记忆诊所中,回顾性选择了19对接受(99m)Tc-HMPAO或(99m)Tc-ECD SPECT检查的轻至中度AD患者。通过病例对照程序,根据性别、年龄(±3岁)和简易精神状态检查表评分(±2分)对患者进行匹配,从而获得两组匹配良好的患者。通过统计参数映射99(高度阈值:P<0.01),将每组中Grober-Buschke选择性提醒测试(SRT)的分数与SPECT进行相关性分析。
(99m)Tc-HMPAO SPECT产生了3个显著的相关簇,涉及右半球的额下回和额中回、海马旁回和壳核;左半球的颞中回和颞上回、岛叶和屏状核。(99m)Tc-ECD在左侧中央后回和顶下小叶产生了一个显著的相关簇。
(99m)Tc-HMPAO SPECT的相关位点在正常个体和病理状态下设计的言语记忆神经生理模型方面似乎比(99m)Tc-ECD的相关位点更一致。这种显著差异的证明在使用这两种化合物之一进行的研究中引入了变异性来源,在解释结果时必须予以考虑。