Eschler B M, Rapley J W
Department of Periodontics, Prevention, and Geriatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
J Periodontol. 1991 Dec;62(12):755-60. doi: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.12.755.
The aim of this investigation was to compare the effectiveness of several different methods of root instrumentation by measuring and comparing the amount of residual stained material following treatment. Also, 2 different methods of quantitating residual stained material were compared. A total of 90 periodontally-involved teeth were extracted and randomly assigned to 1 of 8 treatment groups or to the untreated control group. Experimental treatments consisted of one or a combination of the following: Columbia 13-14 curet, P-10 ultrasonic instrument, diamond-coated P-10 ultrasonic instrument, or antiformin/citric acid chemical treatment. Selected samples were examined using light microscopy in order to determine the amount of cementum removed during root instrumentation. Residual stained material was quantitated using a method of grid-square analysis as well as by the use of photographs and a digitizing tablet. Following instrumentation, it was noted in histologic sections that the complete removal of cementum was rare, although all of the cementum was removed by some experimental treatments in some areas. All mechanical methods of root instrumentation were found to be essentially equal in effectiveness with respect to the removal of plaque and calculus. Chemical debridement alone was found to be ineffective. It was further noted that the grid-square method of analysis produced measurements that were 2 to 8 times higher than measurements produced by the digitizing tablet.
本研究的目的是通过测量和比较治疗后残留染色物质的量,来比较几种不同的根管预备方法的有效性。此外,还比较了两种不同的定量残留染色物质的方法。总共90颗患有牙周病的牙齿被拔除,并随机分配到8个治疗组中的1个组或未治疗的对照组。实验治疗包括以下一种或几种方法的组合:哥伦比亚13 - 14刮治器、P - 10超声器械、金刚石涂层P - 10超声器械或次氯酸钠/柠檬酸化学处理。为了确定根管预备过程中去除的牙骨质量,对选定的样本进行光学显微镜检查。使用网格方块分析法以及通过照片和数字化仪对残留染色物质进行定量。根管预备后,在组织学切片中发现,虽然在某些区域一些实验治疗方法能去除所有牙骨质,但完全去除牙骨质的情况很少见。就去除菌斑和牙石而言,所有机械性根管预备方法在有效性方面基本相当。单独的化学清创被发现无效。还进一步注意到,网格方块分析法得出的测量值比数字化仪得出的测量值高2至8倍。