Rajan R
Department of Physiology, Monash University, Monash, VIC 3800, Australia.
Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Dec;24(12):3589-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05246.x.
Centrifugal olivocochlear (OC) pathways modulate cochlear hearing losses induced in cats by loud sounds varying in bandwidth from tones to clicks and noise bands, in a variety of conditions. The general effect, always to reduce hearing damage, can be a net effect resulting from complex interactions between OC subcomponents (crossed and uncrossed OC pathways). The interactions between these subcomponents vary with type of loud sound, suggesting that sound bandwidth may be important in determining how OC pathways modulate loud sound-induced hearing loss. This dependency was examined and here it is reported that OC pathways do not alter cochlear hearing losses caused by loud noise with a 2-kHz-wide bandwidth intermediate between the loud sounds of previous studies. Increasing stimulus bandwidth even slightly more, to use a loud 3.5-kHz-wide bandwidth noise as the damaging sound, once again revealed OC modulation of cochlear hearing loss. The fact that OC pathways do not modulate cochlear hearing losses induced by loud 2-kHz-wide noise was demonstrated in three very different test conditions in which OC pathways modulate hearing losses caused by narrower or broader bandwidth sounds. This confirmed that the absence of centrifugal modulation of hearing loss to this particular sound was a robust phenomenon not related to test condition. The absence of overall centrifugal effects was also true at the level of subcomponent pathways; neither crossed nor uncrossed OC pathways individually modulated cochlear hearing losses to the loud 2-kHz-wide noise. This surprising frequency dependency has general implications for centrifugal modulation of cochlear responses.
在多种情况下,离心性橄榄耳蜗(OC)通路可调节猫因带宽从纯音到滴答声和噪声带不等的大声响所诱发的耳蜗听力损失。总体效果始终是减轻听力损伤,这可能是OC子成分(交叉和未交叉的OC通路)之间复杂相互作用产生的净效应。这些子成分之间的相互作用随大声响的类型而变化,这表明声音带宽可能在决定OC通路如何调节大声响诱发的听力损失方面很重要。对此依赖性进行了研究,此处报告OC通路不会改变由带宽为2kHz的宽噪声引起的耳蜗听力损失,该带宽介于先前研究的大声响之间。将刺激带宽再稍微增加一点,使用带宽为3.5kHz的大声响噪声作为致损声音,再次揭示了OC对耳蜗听力损失的调节作用。在三种非常不同的测试条件下都证明了OC通路不会调节由带宽为2kHz的大声响噪声诱发的耳蜗听力损失,在这些测试条件下OC通路可调节由更窄或更宽带宽声音引起的听力损失。这证实了对这种特定声音缺乏离心性听力损失调节是一种与测试条件无关的稳健现象。在子成分通路水平上也不存在整体离心效应;交叉或未交叉的OC通路单独都不会调节对带宽为2kHz的大声响噪声的耳蜗听力损失。这种令人惊讶的频率依赖性对耳蜗反应的离心性调节具有普遍意义。