Teede Helena J, Giannopoulos Dimitra, Dalais Fabien S, Hodgson Jonathan, McGrath Barry P
Jean Hailes Research Group, Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2006 Dec;25(6):533-40. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2006.10719569.
To examine the effects of dietary soy/isoflavones on 24 hr blood pressure profiles and arterial function [systemic arterial compliance (SAC), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and brachial arterial flow mediated vasodilation (FMD)] compared to non legume-based plant protein without isoflavones, in hypertensive subjects.
In a 6 month double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over trial, 41 hypertensive subjects (26 men, 15 postmenopausal women), 30-75 years, received soy cereal (40 g soy protein, 118 mg isoflavones) and gluten placebo cereal, each for 3 months.
Thirty-eight subjects completed protocol with results expressed as mean or mean change (+/-SEM) with each intervention. Soy increased urinary isoflavones (daidzein: 8-fold; genistein: 8-fold; equol: 9-fold; ODMA: 18-fold) with no change during gluten placebo. There was no difference in the change in individual 24 hr ambulatory BP parameters (SBP: 2 +/- 2 vs -1 +/- 1 mmHg, p = 0.21; DBP: 1 +/- 1 vs -1 +/- 1 mmHg, p = 0.06) central BP (cSBP: -4 +/- 2 vs 0 +/- 2 mmHg, p = 0.2) or the change in arterial function (FMD: 0.3 +/- 0.5 vs -0.2 +/- 0.5%, p = NS; SAC: 0.02 +/- 0.02 vs -0.02 +/- 0.02 U/mmHg, p = NS; PWV central: -0.2 +/- 0.2 vs 0.0 +/- 0.2 m/sec, p = NS; PWV peripheral: 0.01 +/- 0.3 vs -0.4 +/- 0.4 m/sec, p = NS) noted between interventions. Analysis of the area under curve of 24 hr BP outputs demonstrated that soy protein compared to gluten protein resulted in higher 24 hr systolic BP by 2.3 mmHg (p = 0.003), a higher daytime systolic BP by 3.4 mmHg (p = 0.0002) and a higher daytime diastolic BP by 1.4 mmHg (p = 0.008). Overall 24 hr diastolic BP, night systolic BP and night diastolic BP were not significantly different between groups. Furthermore, soy protein compared to gluten protein resulted in higher 24 hr heart rates by 3.5 bpm (p < 0.0001).
In hypertensive subjects, compared to gluten placebo, soy dietary supplementation containing isoflavones had no effect on arterial function, on average 24 hr ambulatory blood pressure parameters or central blood pressure in men and women with hypertension. Area under the curve of 24 hr profiles demonstrated that daytime BP was higher after soy compared to gluten.
在高血压患者中,研究与不含异黄酮的非豆类植物蛋白相比,膳食大豆/异黄酮对24小时血压曲线及动脉功能[全身动脉顺应性(SAC)、脉搏波速度(PWV)和肱动脉血流介导的血管舒张(FMD)]的影响。
在一项为期6个月的双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉试验中,41名年龄在30 - 75岁的高血压患者(26名男性,15名绝经后女性),分别接受大豆谷物(40克大豆蛋白,118毫克异黄酮)和麸质安慰剂谷物,各为期3个月。
38名受试者完成了试验方案,结果以每次干预后的均值或均值变化(±SEM)表示。大豆使尿中异黄酮增加(大豆苷元:8倍;染料木黄酮:8倍;雌马酚:9倍;ODMA:18倍),而在麸质安慰剂期间无变化。各干预之间,24小时动态血压参数的变化(收缩压:2±2 vs -1±1 mmHg,p = 0.21;舒张压:1±1 vs -1±1 mmHg,p = 0.06)、中心血压(cSBP:-4±2 vs 0±2 mmHg,p = 0.2)或动脉功能的变化(FMD:0.3±0.5 vs -0.2±0.5%,p = 无显著性差异;SAC:0.02±0.02 vs -0.02±0.02 U/mmHg,p = 无显著性差异;中心PWV:-0.2±0.2 vs 0.0±0.2 m/sec,p = 无显著性差异;外周PWV:0.01±0.3 vs -0.4±0.4 m/sec,p = 无显著性差异)均无差异。对24小时血压输出曲线下面积的分析表明,与麸质蛋白相比,大豆蛋白使24小时收缩压升高2.3 mmHg(p = 0.003),白天收缩压升高3.4 mmHg(p = 0.0002),白天舒张压升高1.4 mmHg(p = 0.008)。总体24小时舒张压、夜间收缩压和夜间舒张压在两组之间无显著差异。此外,与麸质蛋白相比,大豆蛋白使24小时心率升高3.5次/分钟(p < 0.0001)。
在高血压患者中,与麸质安慰剂相比,含异黄酮的大豆膳食补充剂对高血压男性和女性的动脉功能、平均24小时动态血压参数或中心血压均无影响。24小时曲线下面积表明,与麸质相比,大豆摄入后白天血压更高。