Logigian Eric L, Ciafaloni Emma, Quinn L Christine, Dilek Nuran, Pandya Shree, Moxley Richard T, Thornton Charles A
Neuromuscular Division, Department of Neurology, Box 673, 601 Elmwood Avenue, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Muscle Nerve. 2007 Apr;35(4):479-85. doi: 10.1002/mus.20722.
To characterize and compare electrical myotonia in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2), 16 patients with genetically confirmed DM1 and 17 patients with DM2 underwent standardized concentric needle electromyography of deltoid, biceps, extensor digitorum communis, first dorsal interosseous, tensor fascia lata (TFL), vastus lateralis (VL), tibialis anterior, and thoracic paraspinal muscles. Eight needle insertions per muscle were made by electromyographers blinded to DM type who recorded the presence and type of myotonia (e.g., classic waxing-waning or less specific waning discharges). Manual muscle testing was performed by a physical therapist. Overall, myotonia was more elicitable in DM1 than DM2; only in VL and TFL was myotonia more elicitable in DM2 than DM1. The major type of myotonia was waxing-waning in DM1, and waning in DM2. Four DM2 (24%), but no DM1 patients had only waning myotonia. In the arms, myotonia was distally predominant in both DM1 and DM2. In the legs, it was distally predominant in DM1, but both proximal and distal in DM2. The severity of myotonia was positively correlated with muscle weakness and with the presence of waxing and waning discharges in DM1, but with neither in DM2. Thus, myotonia is qualitatively and quantitatively different in DM1 than DM2. Except for proximal leg muscles, myotonia is more evocable in DM1 than DM2. It tends to be waxing-waning in DM1 but waning in DM2, thus making electrodiagnosis of DM2 more challenging. Its severity correlates with muscle weakness and the presence of waxing-waning discharges in DM1 but not DM2.
为了描述和比较1型强直性肌营养不良(DM1)和2型强直性肌营养不良(DM2)的电肌强直,对16例基因确诊的DM1患者和17例DM2患者的三角肌、肱二头肌、指总伸肌、第一骨间背侧肌、阔筋膜张肌(TFL)、股外侧肌(VL)、胫骨前肌和胸段椎旁肌进行了标准化的同心针肌电图检查。肌电图检查人员在不知道DM类型的情况下,对每块肌肉进行8次进针,并记录肌强直的存在情况和类型(如典型的渐强-渐弱或不太特异的渐弱放电)。由物理治疗师进行徒手肌力测试。总体而言,DM1比DM2更容易诱发肌强直;仅在VL和TFL中,DM2比DM1更容易诱发肌强直。DM1中肌强直的主要类型是渐强-渐弱型,而DM2中是渐弱型。4例DM2患者(24%)仅有渐弱性肌强直,但DM1患者中没有。在手臂,DM1和DM2的肌强直均以远端为主。在腿部,DM1的肌强直以远端为主,而DM2的肌强直近端和远端均有。DM1中肌强直的严重程度与肌肉无力以及渐强-渐弱放电的存在呈正相关,但在DM2中与两者均无相关性。因此,DM1和DM2的肌强直在质和量上均有所不同。除了近端腿部肌肉外,DM1比DM2更容易诱发肌强直。DM1中肌强直倾向于渐强-渐弱型,而DM2中是渐弱型,因此DM2的电诊断更具挑战性。其严重程度在DM1中与肌肉无力和渐强-渐弱放电的存在相关,但在DM2中不相关。