Lüderitz B, Mletzko R, Jung W, Manz M
Department of Medicine-Cardiology, University of Bonn, F.R.G.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 6:S48-52.
Antiarrhythmic treatment with single agents is often ineffective and can be limited by dose-dependent side effects. Therefore, combinations of antiarrhythmic drugs in smaller and well-tolerated doses are advocated in cases refractory to single antiarrhythmic drugs. Basically, substances belonging to the same electrophysiologic class should not be combined. However, drugs of different subsets of class I may be combined. Agents that have pharmacokinetic interactions, such as quinidine and amiodarone, should not be given together because this combination may be associated with a considerable proarrhythmic effect. A combination of beta-adrenoreceptor blockers with class I antiarrhythmic drugs may be effective, mainly in cases in which the arrhythmia is dependent on adrenergic stimulation. The combination of class III and IB substances can be useful in some cases, from the electrophysiological and clinical point of view. Among the successful combinations of this type are amiodarone and mexiletine, sotalol and mexiletine, or sotalol and tocainide. In 34 patients, the reduction of ventricular premature beats by sotalol alone was 28%, and by sotalol plus mexiletine or tocainide was 79%. Complex ventricular arrhythmias were suppressed by sotalol alone by less than 40% and by sotalol plus mexiletine or tocainide by more than 80%. There was no difference in the effectiveness of mexiletine and tocainide (both of them being class IB drugs) in this combination. However, mexiletine was associated with fewer adverse effects than was tocainide. In patients refractory to amiodarone alone or to a combination with mexiletine, the combined treatment with amiodarone and class IC drugs such as flecainide and encainide prolongs the cycle length of ventricular tachycardia, but does not suppress induction of ventricular tachycardia during programmed stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
单一药物进行抗心律失常治疗往往无效,且可能受剂量依赖性副作用的限制。因此,对于单一抗心律失常药物治疗无效的病例,主张联合使用小剂量且耐受性良好的抗心律失常药物。原则上,属于同一电生理类别的药物不应联合使用。然而,I类不同亚组的药物可以联合使用。具有药代动力学相互作用的药物,如奎尼丁和胺碘酮,不应同时使用,因为这种联合可能会产生相当大的促心律失常作用。β肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂与I类抗心律失常药物联合使用可能有效,主要适用于心律失常依赖于肾上腺素能刺激的情况。从电生理和临床角度来看,III类和IB类药物联合在某些情况下可能有用。这类成功的联合用药包括胺碘酮和美西律、索他洛尔和美西律,或索他洛尔和妥卡尼。在34例患者中,单独使用索他洛尔时室性早搏减少28%,索他洛尔加美西律或妥卡尼时减少79%。单独使用索他洛尔时,复杂性室性心律失常的抑制率不到40%,索他洛尔加美西律或妥卡尼时超过80%。在这种联合用药中,美西律和妥卡尼(均为IB类药物)的疗效没有差异。然而,美西律的不良反应比妥卡尼少。对于单独使用胺碘酮无效或与美西律联合治疗无效的患者,胺碘酮与IC类药物如氟卡尼和恩卡尼联合治疗可延长室性心动过速的周期长度,但不能抑制程序刺激期间室性心动过速的诱发。(摘要截选至250字)