Mehl-Madrona Lewis, Kligler Benjamin, Silverman Shoshana, Lynton Holly, Merrell Woodson
Department of Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Explore (NY). 2007 Jan-Feb;3(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2006.10.003.
Synergy has been proposed between modalities operating at different levels of action. Acupuncture and craniosacral therapy are two very different modalities for which synergy has been proposed. This study sought to test for such synergy and to determine if complementary therapies would improve pulmonary function and quality of life for people suffering from asthma, as well as reducing anxiety, depression, and medication usage.
Subjects were randomly assignment to one of five groups: acupuncture, craniosacral therapy, acupuncture and craniosacral, attention control, and waiting list control.
Subjects received 12 sessions of equal length with pretreatment and posttreatment assessment of pulmonary function, asthma quality of life, depression, and anxiety. Medication use was also assessed.
Synergy was not demonstrated. When treatment was compared with the control group, statistically treatment was significantly better than the control group in improving asthma quality of life, whereas reducing medication use with pulmonary function test results remained the same. However, the combination of acupuncture and craniosacral treatment was not superior to each therapy alone. In fact, although all active patients received 12 treatment sessions, those who received all treatments from one practitioner had statistically significant reductions in anxiety when compared with those receiving the same number of treatments from multiple practitioners. No effects on depression were found.
Acupuncture and/or craniosacral therapy are potentially useful adjuncts to the conventional care of adults with asthma, but the combination of the two does not provide additional benefit over each therapy alone.
有人提出在不同作用水平发挥作用的治疗方式之间存在协同作用。针灸和颅骶疗法是两种截然不同的治疗方式,有人认为它们之间存在协同作用。本研究旨在测试这种协同作用,并确定辅助疗法是否能改善哮喘患者的肺功能和生活质量,以及减轻焦虑、抑郁和药物使用量。
将受试者随机分配到五组之一:针灸组、颅骶疗法组、针灸加颅骶疗法组、注意力控制组和等待名单对照组。
受试者接受12次时长相等的治疗,并在治疗前和治疗后对肺功能、哮喘生活质量、抑郁和焦虑进行评估。还评估了药物使用情况。
未证明存在协同作用。与对照组相比,治疗组在改善哮喘生活质量方面在统计学上显著优于对照组,而在肺功能测试结果方面药物使用量的减少情况保持不变。然而,针灸和颅骶疗法联合治疗并不优于单独的每种疗法。事实上,尽管所有接受治疗的患者都接受了12次治疗,但与从多名治疗师处接受相同次数治疗的患者相比,从一名治疗师处接受所有治疗的患者在焦虑方面有统计学上的显著降低。未发现对抑郁有影响。
针灸和/或颅骶疗法可能是成年哮喘患者传统护理的有用辅助手段,但两者联合使用并不比单独使用每种疗法带来更多益处。