Suppr超能文献

心房颤动导管消融术后膈神经损伤

Phrenic nerve injury after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Sacher Frederic, Jais Pierre, Stephenson Kent, O'Neill Mark D, Hocini Meleze, Clementy Jacques, Stevenson William G, Haissaguerre Michel

机构信息

CHU de Bordeaux/ Universite Bordeaux II, France.

出版信息

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2007 Jan 1;7(1):1-6.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Phrenic Nerve Injury (PNI) has been well studied by cardiac surgeons. More recently it has been recognized as a potential complication of catheter ablation with a prevalence of 0.11 to 0.48 % after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. This review will focus on PNI after AF ablation. Anatomical studies have shown a close relationship between the right phrenic nerve and it's proximity to the superior vena cava (SVC), and the antero-inferior part of the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV). In addition, the proximity of the left phrenic nerve to the left atrial appendage has been well established. Independent of the type of ablation catheter (4 mm, 8 mm, irrigated tip, balloon) or energy source used (radiofrequency (RF), ultrasound, cryothermia, and laser); the risk of PNI exists during ablation at the critical areas listed above. Although up to thirty-one percent of patients with PNI after AF ablation remain asymptomatic, dyspnea remain the cardinal symptom and is present in all symptomatic patients. Despite the theoretical risk for significant adverse effect on functional status and quality of life, short-term outcomes from published studies appear favorable with 81% of patients with PNI having a complete recovery after 7 +/- 7 months.

CONCLUSION

Existing studies have described PNI as an uncommon but avoidable complication in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for AF. Prior to ablation at the SVC, antero-inferior RSPV ostium or the left atrial appendage, pacing should be performed before energy delivery. If phrenic nerve capture is documented, energy delivery should be avoided at this site. Electrophysiologist's vigilance as well as pacing prior to ablation at high risk sites in close proximity to the phrenic nerve are the currently available tools to avoid the complication of PNI.

摘要

未标注

心脏外科医生对膈神经损伤(PNI)进行了充分研究。最近,它被认为是导管消融的一种潜在并发症,在房颤(AF)消融术后的发生率为0.11%至0.48%。本综述将聚焦于房颤消融术后的膈神经损伤。解剖学研究表明,右膈神经与其靠近上腔静脉(SVC)以及右上肺静脉(RSPV)前下部的位置关系密切。此外,左膈神经与左心耳的接近关系也已明确。无论使用何种消融导管类型(4毫米、8毫米、灌注尖端、球囊)或能量源(射频(RF)、超声、冷冻疗法和激光),在上述关键区域进行消融时都存在膈神经损伤的风险。尽管房颤消融术后高达31%的膈神经损伤患者仍无症状,但呼吸困难仍是主要症状,且所有有症状的患者都会出现。尽管理论上存在对功能状态和生活质量产生重大不良影响的风险,但已发表研究的短期结果似乎良好,81%的膈神经损伤患者在7±7个月后完全康复。

结论

现有研究将膈神经损伤描述为接受房颤肺静脉隔离术患者中一种不常见但可避免的并发症。在对SVC、RSPV前下部开口或左心耳进行消融之前,应在施加能量前进行起搏。如果记录到膈神经捕获,应避免在该部位施加能量。电生理学家的警惕性以及在靠近膈神经的高风险部位消融前进行起搏是目前可用于避免膈神经损伤并发症的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f4/1764817/5de4c0630327/ipej070001-01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验