MARS: a futile tool in centres without active liver transplant support.

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Studies on Molecular Adsorbent Recycling Systems (MARS) showed inconclusive survival benefits.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We evaluated the efficacy of MARS for patients with either acute liver failure (ALF) or acute-on-chronic liver failure (AoCLF) at our centre, from February 2002 till April 2006 retrospectively.

RESULTS

Fifty ALF patients underwent median (range) three (1-10) sessions of MARS. Acute exacerbations of chronic hepatitis B (n=26) and drug-induced liver injury (n=12) were the commonest causes. Living donors were available in 6, 2 paediatric patients underwent left lobe and four adults underwent right lobe living donor liver transplant. Among the 44 ALF patients without a suitable living donor, one underwent deceased donor liver transplant and survived, another 19-year-old male with acute exacerbations of chronic hepatitis B recovered without transplant, and the rest died. Twenty-six had AoCLF and underwent four (1-10) MARS sessions. Sepsis (n=16) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n=4) were the commonest precipitating factors. None had a suitable living or deceased donor, suitable for transplantation during their hospitalization. Only one of 26 AoCLF patients survived the hospitalization, but the survivor died of sepsis 1 month later.

CONCLUSION

In this non-randomized study, survival after MARS was related to the availability of transplant, and in patients where living or deceased donor transplant was unavailable, MARS was of little benefit. Randomized-controlled trials on MARS((R)) are urgently needed to clarify its clinical utility.