Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana 47907.
Genetics. 1980 Feb;94(2):477-96. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.2.477.
Three alternative selection methods for extending selection limits or breaking response plateaus were compared over ten generations in a replicated model experiment using two unrelated populations of Drosophila melanogaster that no longer responded to purebred selection for high egg number, a heterotic polygenic trait. The three methods were: (1) reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS) with selection within each of the plateaued populations based solely on crossbred performance, (2) a modification of reciprocal recurrent selection (MRRS) with selection within each population based on both purebred and crossbred performance, and (3) purebred selection within a new synthetic population formed by crossing the two plateaued populations.--Conflicting estimates were obtained for heritability of purebred egg number in each of the plateaued populations. The realized heritability values and estimates from diallel analyses indicated an absence of additive genetic variation for both populations; however, estimates from conventional intraclass correlation methods were positive. The diallel analyses revealed significant amounts of nonadditive gene effects for purebred egg number in each population, while the significant gene effects for crossbred egg numbers were additive. Estimates of the genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred egg number were negative (-0.85 +/- 0.68 and -0.32 +/- 0.25) for the two base populations.--All three alternatives to continued purebred selection gave significant responses, with the average gain per generation from MRRS being significantly superior to the other two methods. Observed purebred and crossbred responses under RRS were in agreement with quantitative genetic theory. Such was not the case for MRRS, which suggested the possibility of major gene segregation.--Evidence supporting a negative genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance and the possibility of overdominance is presented and discussed.
三种替代选择方法用于扩展选择限制或打破响应平台,在使用不再对纯系选择高产卵数(杂种优势多基因性状)有反应的两个无关黑腹果蝇种群的重复模型实验中经过十代进行了比较。这三种方法是:(1)基于杂交表现的仅在每个平台种群内进行的相互回交选择(RRS),(2)基于纯系和杂交表现的每个种群内选择的相互回交选择(MRRS)的修改版,和(3)通过交叉两个平台种群形成的新综合种群内的纯系选择。-在每个平台种群中,纯系产卵数的遗传力估计值存在冲突。实现的遗传力值和来自双列分析的估计值表明两个种群都没有加性遗传变异;然而,来自常规内类相关方法的估计值是阳性的。双列分析显示每个种群的纯系产卵数都存在大量的非加性基因效应,而杂交产卵数的显著基因效应是加性的。纯系和杂交产卵数之间的遗传相关估计值为负(-0.85 +/- 0.68 和 -0.32 +/- 0.25),对于两个基础种群。-所有三种继续进行纯系选择的替代方法都产生了显著的响应,MRRS 的平均每代增益明显优于其他两种方法。RRS 下观察到的纯系和杂交响应与数量遗传理论一致。MRRS 并非如此,这表明存在主要基因分离的可能性。-提出并讨论了支持纯系和杂交表现之间的负遗传相关和超显性可能性的证据。