Kennebäck Göran, Tabrizi Fariborz, Lindell Peter, Nordlander Rolf
Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge 14186 Stockholm, Sweden.
Europace. 2007 Mar;9(3):186-91. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul185. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
This study examines the recurrence of high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) during a follow-up period of 2 years in patients with restored AV node function after antiarrhythmic drug withdrawal at implantation of a pacemaker.
Nine men and eight women (77 +/- 7 years) taking antiarrhythmic drugs (beta-receptor blockers in 15) and presenting with high-degree AVB were followed for 2 years after being taken off drugs upon receiving a permanent pacemaker with special bradycardia detection software.
At inclusion, surface ECG identified two subsets of patients: a QRS duration < 120 ms (n = 5) and those with a QRS duration > or =120 ms (n = 12). During the 2-year follow-up, progression to high-degree AVB occurred in these groups: 1/5 (20%) and 9/12 (75%) P < 0.05. Six patients had to be restarted on drugs, mostly beta-receptor blockers, due to atrial tachyarrhythmias: 3/5 and 3/12. In total, 16 patients (94%) either developed high-degree AVB needing pacing or atrial tachyarrhythmias requiring drug treatment.
Patients on beta-receptor blocking drugs and QRS width > or =120 ms developing high-degree AVB should be recommended a pacemaker without further investigation or observation.
本研究旨在探讨在植入起搏器时停用抗心律失常药物后,房室结功能恢复的患者在2年随访期内高度房室传导阻滞(AVB)的复发情况。
9名男性和8名女性(77±7岁)服用抗心律失常药物(15例服用β受体阻滞剂)并出现高度AVB,在接受带有特殊心动过缓检测软件的永久性起搏器后停药,随访2年。
纳入时,体表心电图确定了两组患者:QRS时限<120 ms(n = 5)和QRS时限≥120 ms(n = 12)。在2年随访期间,这些组中进展为高度AVB的情况如下:1/5(20%)和9/12(75%),P<0.05。6例患者因房性快速心律失常不得不重新开始用药,主要是β受体阻滞剂:3/5和3/12。总共16例患者(94%)要么发生了需要起搏的高度AVB,要么出现了需要药物治疗的房性快速心律失常。
对于服用β受体阻滞剂且QRS宽度≥120 ms并发生高度AVB的患者,应建议植入起搏器,无需进一步检查或观察。