Boswell Mark V, Colson James D, Sehgal Nalini, Dunbar Elmer E, Epter Richard
Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):229-53.
Facet joints are considered to be a common source of chronic spinal pain. Facet joint interventions, including intraarticular injections, medial branch nerve blocks, and neurotomy (radiofrequency and cryoneurolysis) are used to manage chronic facet-mediated spinal pain. A systematic review of therapeutic facet interventions published in January 2005, concluded that facet interventions were variably effective for short-term and long-term relief of facet joint pain.
To provide an updated evaluation of the effectiveness of 3 types of facet joint interventions in managing chronic spinal pain.
A systematic review utilizing criteria established by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for evaluation of randomized and non-randomized trials and the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group for randomized trials.
Data sources included relevant literature of the English language identified through searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE (November 2004 to December 2006) and manual searches of bibliographies of known primary and review articles within the last 2 years. Results of the analyses were performed for the different modes of facet joint interventions for the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine, to determine short- and long-term outcome measurements and complications associated with these procedures.
The primary outcome measure was pain relief. For intraarticular facet joint injections and medial branch blocks, short-term pain relief was defined as relief lasting less than 6 weeks and long-term relief as 6 weeks or longer. For medial branch blocks, repeated injections at defined intervals provided long-term pain relief. For medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy, short-term pain relief was defined as relief lasting less than 3 months and long-term relief as lasting 3 months or longer. Other outcome measures included functional improvement, improvement of psychological status, and return to work.
For cervical intraarticular facet joint injections, the evidence is limited for short- and long-term pain relief. For lumbar intraarticular facet joint injections, the evidence is moderate for short- and long-term pain relief. For cervical, thoracic, and lumbar medial branch nerve blocks with local anesthetics (with or without steroids), the evidence is moderate for short- and long-term pain relief with repeat interventions. The evidence for pain relief with radiofrequency neurotomy of cervical and lumbar medial branch nerves is moderate for short- and long-term pain relief, and indeterminate for thoracic facet neurotomy.
With intraarticular facet joint injections, the evidence for short- and long-term pain relief is limited for cervical pain and moderate for lumbar pain. For medial branch blocks, the evidence is moderate for short- and long-term pain relief. For medial branch neurotomy, the evidence is moderate for short- and long-term pain relief.
小关节被认为是慢性脊柱疼痛的常见来源。小关节干预措施,包括关节内注射、内侧支神经阻滞和神经切断术(射频和冷冻神经lysis),用于治疗慢性小关节介导的脊柱疼痛。2005年1月发表的一篇关于治疗性小关节干预措施的系统评价得出结论,小关节干预措施在短期和长期缓解小关节疼痛方面的效果各不相同。
对3种小关节干预措施治疗慢性脊柱疼痛的有效性进行更新评估。
一项系统评价,采用美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)制定的评估随机和非随机试验的标准,以及Cochrane肌肉骨骼审查小组用于随机试验的标准。
数据来源包括通过检索MEDLINE和EMBASE(2004年11月至2006年12月)确定的英文相关文献,以及对过去2年已知的主要和综述文章的参考文献进行的手工检索。对颈椎、胸椎和腰椎小关节干预的不同模式进行分析,以确定这些手术的短期和长期结果测量以及并发症。
主要结果测量是疼痛缓解。对于关节内小关节注射和内侧支阻滞,短期疼痛缓解定义为持续时间少于6周的缓解,长期缓解定义为6周或更长时间的缓解。对于内侧支阻滞,在规定间隔重复注射可提供长期疼痛缓解。对于内侧支射频神经切断术,短期疼痛缓解定义为持续时间少于3个月的缓解,长期缓解定义为持续3个月或更长时间的缓解。其他结果测量包括功能改善、心理状态改善和重返工作岗位。
对于颈椎关节内小关节注射,短期和长期疼痛缓解的证据有限。对于腰椎关节内小关节注射,短期和长期疼痛缓解的证据中等。对于颈椎、胸椎和腰椎使用局部麻醉剂(有或无类固醇)的内侧支神经阻滞,重复干预的短期和长期疼痛缓解证据中等。颈椎和腰椎内侧支神经射频神经切断术缓解疼痛的证据在短期和长期疼痛缓解方面中等,而胸椎小关节神经切断术的证据不确定。
对于关节内小关节注射,颈椎疼痛短期和长期疼痛缓解的证据有限,腰椎疼痛的证据中等。对于内侧支阻滞,短期和长期疼痛缓解的证据中等。对于内侧支神经切断术,短期和长期疼痛缓解的证据中等。