Hemstreet Brian A, Stolpman Nancy, Badesch David B, May Sondra K, McCollum Marianne
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Dec;22(12):2449-55. doi: 10.1185/030079906X148463.
Evaluate potassium and phosphorus repletion in hospitalized patients. Assess the potential role for use of various methods, including healthcare information technology, to improve prescribing and patient safety.
Inpatient medication profiles were screened to identify orders for potassium and phosphorus replacement products. Electronic laboratory and medical records were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Eligibility for oral therapy was defined by the presence of other scheduled oral medications on the medication profile. Appropriateness of prescribing was based on adherence to the hospital guidelines for repletion.
Overall, 134 orders for potassium in 92 patients and 36 orders for phosphorus in 27 patients were evaluated over a 3-week data collection period. Intravenous (IV) potassium was prescribed in 73% of replacement episodes (46% as single doses and 54% within large volume IV fluids), with 85% for normokalemia or mild-to-moderate cases of hypokalemia. Phosphorus orders involved single doses of IV potassium phosphate (mean 13.1 mmol) in 75% of cases. Approximately 85% of doses were for mild or moderate hypophosphatemia. Eligibility for oral therapy was evident in 74% of normokalemic or mild hypokalemic cases receiving IV potassium products and in 33% of cases receiving IV phosphorus replacement. Six cases of mild hyperkalemia were observed. No hyperphosphatemia was documented. Study limitations include use of a retrospective design, inability to discern whether some electrolyte doses were given with a preventative intent, potential overestimation of the number of patients eligible for oral repletion, and lack of data on the accessibility of the laboratory serum concentrations or the awareness of serum values to the prescribers.
Intravenous potassium and phosphate products are commonly prescribed for mild or moderate cases of hypokalemia or hypophosphatemia. Many patients met eligibility for oral therapy. Efforts to enhance prescriber education and implement computerized prescribing and decision support systems have the potential to improve prescribing and reduce possibilities of adverse drug events and medication errors related to potassium and phosphate administration.
评估住院患者钾和磷的补充情况。评估包括医疗信息技术在内的各种方法在改善处方开具及患者安全方面的潜在作用。
筛查住院患者用药记录,以确定钾和磷补充剂的医嘱。利用电子实验室和医疗记录评估疗效和安全性。口服治疗的适用性根据用药记录中是否存在其他常规口服药物来确定。处方开具的合理性基于是否符合医院的补充指南。
在为期3周的数据收集期内,共评估了92例患者的134份钾医嘱和27例患者的36份磷医嘱。73%的补充疗程开具了静脉注射(IV)钾(46%为单次剂量,54%在大容量静脉输液中),其中85%用于正常血钾或轻度至中度低钾血症病例。磷医嘱中75%的情况涉及单次静脉注射磷酸钾(平均13.1 mmol)。约85%的剂量用于轻度或中度低磷血症。在接受静脉注射钾产品的正常血钾或轻度低钾血症病例中,74%有口服治疗的适用性;在接受静脉注射磷补充剂的病例中,33%有口服治疗的适用性。观察到6例轻度高钾血症病例。未记录到高磷血症病例。研究局限性包括采用回顾性设计、无法辨别某些电解质剂量是否出于预防目的给药、可能高估了适合口服补充的患者数量,以及缺乏关于实验室血清浓度可及性或处方者对血清值知晓情况的数据。
静脉注射钾和磷酸盐产品常用于轻度或中度低钾血症或低磷血症病例。许多患者符合口服治疗的条件。加强处方者教育以及实施计算机化处方和决策支持系统,有可能改善处方开具情况,并减少与钾和磷酸盐给药相关的药物不良事件及用药错误的可能性。