Moore Susan, Tumeh John, Wojtanowski Steven, Flowers Christopher
Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Value Health. 2007 Jan-Feb;10(1):23-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00141.x.
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a significant problem for cancer patients. Aprepitant, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist, is approved for use with 5-HT3 antagonists and corticosteroids to prevent CINV associated with highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the cost-effectiveness of standard aprepitant use has not been established.
We developed a Markov model to compare three strategies for CINV: conventional treatment with a 5-HT3 antagonist and a corticosteroid, conventional treatment plus aprepitant, and conventional treatment with aprepitant added after the onset of CINV. Data from published clinical trials provided probabilities and utilities for the model. Data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Federal Supply Scale provided costs for medical resources and medications utilized. Resource use data were based on a randomized clinical trial and routine clinical practice. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for each aprepitant strategy was calculated in US$ per healthy day equivalent (HDE) and converted to dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainty in model parameters.
Adding aprepitant after CINV occurred cost $264 per HDE ($96,333/QALY). The three-drug strategy cost $267/HDE with a 95% confidence range of $248-$305/HDE ($97,429/QALY; $90,396-$111,239/QALY). In univariate analyses, the most influential factors on the ICER were: the cost of aprepitant, the likelihood of delayed CINV without aprepitant, the likelihood of acute CINV with/without aprepitant, and the increase in HDE from avoiding CINV.
Aprepitant provides modest incremental benefits compared with conventional management of CINV. Routine aprepitant use appears most cost-effective when the likelihood of delayed CINV or the cost of rescue medications is high.
化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)是癌症患者面临的一个重大问题。阿瑞匹坦是一种新型的NK-1受体拮抗剂,已被批准与5-羟色胺3(5-HT3)拮抗剂和皮质类固醇联合使用,以预防与高致吐性化疗相关的CINV。然而,标准使用阿瑞匹坦的成本效益尚未确定。
我们建立了一个马尔可夫模型,以比较三种CINV治疗策略:使用5-HT3拮抗剂和皮质类固醇的传统治疗、传统治疗加阿瑞匹坦,以及在CINV发作后添加阿瑞匹坦的传统治疗。已发表临床试验的数据提供了模型的概率和效用。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心以及联邦供应量表的数据提供了所使用医疗资源和药物的成本。资源使用数据基于一项随机临床试验和常规临床实践。计算了每种阿瑞匹坦策略的增量成本效益比(ICER),以每健康日当量(HDE)的美元数表示,并转换为每质量调整生命年(QALY)的美元数。单变量和概率敏感性分析解决了模型参数的不确定性。
在CINV发生后添加阿瑞匹坦,每HDE成本为264美元(96,333美元/QALY)。三联药物策略的成本为267美元/HDE,95%置信区间为248-305美元/HDE(97,429美元/QALY;90,396-111,239美元/QALY)。在单变量分析中,对ICER影响最大的因素是:阿瑞匹坦的成本、无阿瑞匹坦时延迟性CINV的可能性、有/无阿瑞匹坦时急性CINV的可能性,以及避免CINV导致的HDE增加。
与CINV的传统管理相比,阿瑞匹坦提供了适度的增量益处。当延迟性CINV的可能性或救援药物的成本较高时,常规使用阿瑞匹坦似乎最具成本效益。