Liu Jian, Chrisman Paul A, Erickson David E, McLuckey Scott A
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2084, USA.
Anal Chem. 2007 Feb 1;79(3):1073-81. doi: 10.1021/ac061798t.
Computer simulations of electrospray ionization (ESI) and collision-induced dissociation (CID) experiments were employed to examine the informing power associated with "top-down" proteomics implemented with some commonly used mass analyzers, i.e., the quadrupole ion trap (QIT), the Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (FT-ICRMS), and the time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer. Using a ratio of the separated (or resolved) peaks to the total number of predicted peaks as a measure of informing power, the ESI-MS simulation of a mixture of proteins showed that the FT-ICRMS exhibited the highest informing power among the three instruments being studied, with the QIT giving the lowest informing power, which was expected from the analysis of the "component capacity" of the three approaches. Also as expected on the basis of resolving elements per component, a dramatic increase in the informing power of the approach was obtained when ion/ion proton-transfer reactions were used to reduce the number of peaks and to minimize overlap between ions of different mass and charge but similar mass-to-charge ratio. With the assumptions made in this study, the informing power of the TOF + ion/ion approach rivaled or even exceeded that of the FT-ICRMS approach, despite significantly lower mass resolution. This result stemmed from both a reduction in the number of peaks and their dispersion over a much wider range of mass-to-charge ratios. Similar results were obtained from the CID simulation, where the informing power of different approaches was evaluated on the basis of the ratio of the number of ions for which a mass could be determined unambiguously to the total number of ions in the spectra.
采用电喷雾电离(ESI)和碰撞诱导解离(CID)实验的计算机模拟,来检验与使用一些常用质量分析器实施的“自上而下”蛋白质组学相关的信息提供能力,即四极离子阱(QIT)、傅里叶变换离子回旋共振质谱仪(FT-ICRMS)和飞行时间(TOF)质谱仪。以分离(或分辨)峰数与预测峰总数的比值作为信息提供能力的衡量标准,对蛋白质混合物进行的ESI-MS模拟表明,在研究的三种仪器中,FT-ICRMS的信息提供能力最高,QIT的信息提供能力最低,这从对三种方法的“组分容量”分析中是可以预期的。同样基于每个组分的分辨元素预期,当使用离子/离子质子转移反应来减少峰数并最小化不同质量和电荷但质荷比相似的离子之间的重叠时,该方法的信息提供能力有显著提高。基于本研究中的假设,尽管质量分辨率显著较低,但TOF +离子/离子方法的信息提供能力与FT-ICRMS方法相当甚至超过了它。这一结果源于峰数的减少以及它们在更宽的质荷比范围内的分散。从CID模拟中也获得了类似的结果,其中基于能够明确确定质量的离子数与光谱中离子总数的比值来评估不同方法的信息提供能力。